What is the difference between LNAV/VNAV and LPV minimums on an RNAV approach?

Lnafziger
  • What is the difference between LNAV/VNAV and LPV minimums on an RNAV approach? Lnafziger

    This approach shows two sets of minimums that both have vertical guidance with a Decision Altitude (DA). What is the difference between LNAV/VNAV and LPV, and why does LPV have lower minimums?

    KFXE RNAV 26 Approach plate

  • LPV is a higher precision approach requiring equipment beyond what is needed for LNAV/VNAV. In particular you need dual WAAS recievers in a certified installation. The improved guidance is what allows the lower DH. See this link for more information.

  • LPV - Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance is some kind of enhanced satellite navigation with an required accuracy of 16 meters in the horizontal and 20 meters in the vertical plane during 95 percent of the time, achieved by multiple special GPS (WAAS) receivers. Obviously this accuracy allows to reduce the minima on the approaches.

  • LNAV/VNAV approaches were originally designed for larger, more sophisticated turbine aircraft, utilizing onboard Flight Management Systems (FMS). These types of approaches uses barometric altimeters and ground radio equipment to compute a descent path and add vertical guidance to an existing non-precision approach.

    An LPV approach still provides vertical guidance and is a precision approach, but in contrast uses WAAS GPS satellite information to provide the aircraft with the vertical descent information.

    Usually a WAAS approved GPS navigator, like the Garmin 430w, is capable of flying both LPV and LNAV/VNAV approaches.

Tags
Related questions and answers
  • What is the difference between technical consumption and fuel drain in a fuel calculation system? Both of them reduce the amount of block fuel of aircraft. I assume technical consumption is not equal with trip fuel usage?!

  • This approach shows two sets of minimums that both have vertical guidance with a Decision Altitude (DA). What is the difference between LNAV/VNAV and LPV, and why does LPV have lower minimums?

  • This question is somewhat related to this other one. I listened to this exchange between a helicopter and Newark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHNvXPbZ7WI The helicopter wants to land at Newark. The controller tells the helicopter to remain clear of the Class B. I'm aware that the controllers must give clearance to operate in certain classes of airspace, and the helicopter wasn't granted clearance to do so. Why was the helicopter denied (as far as can be deduced)? What should the pilot have done differently, either to get clearance to land at Newark or to anticipate not being able to?

  • actually are (or, as most pilots prefer to think, you're lower than what your altimeter reads) Have a look at this VOR approach into Newark Most altitude restrictions are a minimum level, so you're free to fly higher if it's a particularly cold day. But have a look at LOCKI intersection, the final approach fix. That's at 1500 ft, not at-or-above. At -40, this will put you around 1100 ft above...Non-precision instrument approaches generally have altitude restrictions which get lower when you get closer to the airport. I always figured these restrictions were AMSL using the current altimeter

  • examples....). That is, until I ran across this little tidbit in the Air Traffic Control Order while researching another question: 4-8-6. CIRCLING APPROACH a. Circling approach instructions may only be given for aircraft landing at airports with operational control towers. So then the question becomes, why do they have circling minimums at non-towered airports?? No tower here. ATC can't clear me to circle. Why do we have circling minimums??

  • FAR 91.3 says: Aircraft approach category means a grouping of aircraft based on a speed of VREF, if specified, or if VREF is not specified, 1.3 Vso at the maximum certificated landing weight...) Category D: Speed 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots. (5) Category E: Speed 166 knots or more. So an aircraft category never changes because it is always Vref at max landing weight. What if I fly an approach at a speed that falls into a different category? For instance, a jet may land at significantly less than this speed if very light, or more than this speed if landing with less

  • Inspired by a discussion in chat. Most GA piston singles are powered by either Lycoming or Continental engines. The engine designs used by both manufacturers are broadly similar (4-cycle, horizontally-opposed, gasoline-powered, air-cooled), and they're both generally available with either carburetors or fuel injection, but I know they're not "identical products". What are some of the differences between the designs used by the two manufacturers, and what practical implications do those choices have for pilots?

  • So let's assume that I'm the sole manipulator of the flight controls in an aircraft in which I'm rated and that I fly an instrument approach. What weather does the FAA require (assuming that I'm not wearing a view limiting device) in order to log the approach for currency requirements? For instance, if I am cleared for an ILS in visual conditions, can I log it? What if I start the approach in the clouds and break out at 1,500 ft and continue the approach? 1,000 ft? Before/after the outer marker? 150 feet above minimums? I think that you get the idea....

  • Let's say that we're directly west of CATLI and have been cleared direct CATLI for the RNAV approach. We load the approach into the GNS430 and proceed direct the fix. After crossing CATLI outbound for the hold-in-lieu-of-procedure-turn, we realize that we want to stay in the hold for a few more turns. How do I tell the 430 that I don't want it to sequence to ZAMGI upon arrival at CATLI?

  • certified but prefer to stay VFR to dodge icy clouds along the way. Now I’m about 15nm from my destination, talking to approach control, and the ATIS calls the ceiling overcast: it's apparent I'll have to file one way or another. Approach is busy, but not overwhelmed. What is the best way to handle this situation on the radio? I have the ATIS, picked an approach and have a squawk code (advisories): a). do I ask approach directly for the IFR clearance, and what is the officially sanctionned phraseology? Also: do I have to cancel IFR when I’m on the ground/see the runway i.e. is the clearance

Data information