This question is about light, tricycle, single engine aircraft.
I have made it a habit to raise the flaps right after touchdown (when the nosewheel is on the ground). My instructor used to do that every time during initial training so I took over the habit.
It makes sense to do this for the following reasons:
However, I was recently checked out on a C182 that I wanted to rent in Florida and when I raised the flaps right after touchdown the instructor shouted "what the < beep > are you doing? You should never raise the flaps until you've turned off the runway". He couldn't provide a good reason though, so when I told him about the things I listed above he simple mumbled something about keeping my attention on the runway instead of fiddling with the flaps lever (which is a something I don't even have to think about)
My question is: Is it really a bad idea to raise the flaps that soon after landing? Or is it actually a good habit?
(I noticed that most airliners also wait until they're clear of the runway, but these jets have spoilers to get rid of all the lift)
You should wait until clearing the runway before performing any non-essential checklist items because you are still in a critical phase of flight and at a relatively high risk while still on the runway. You should focus 100% of your attention to controlling the airplane (don't stop flying the airplane until you come to a complete stop) and watching for other traffic (or someone crossing the runway in front of you) that might be a hazard.
There is also the possibility that in a retractable gear airplane you could accidently retract the gear if you are moving things while still preoccupied with landing. Once you exit the runway and come to a complete stop, you can devote the proper attention to the after landing checklist so will be more likely to complete it correctly without missing any items that may become an issue on your next flight.
That being said, follow the guidance in your POH. Sometimes there are abnormal situations that actually call for this, like voretaq7 mentions in his answer, the Cherokee POH references it as a short field landing technique.
The FAA also covers this in AC 91-73B - Parts 91 and 135 Single Pilot, Flight School Procedures During Taxi Operations. It says (in part):
7. SINGLE-PILOT PROCEDURES.
In addition, upon landing, no items should be changed or moved until the entire aircraft has crossed the respective runway’s hold short line.
NOTE: After the entire aircraft crosses over the landing runway’s hold short line, conduct after-landing checklist items, based upon company procedures, before contacting ATC for taxi instructions.
The PTS also repeatedly stresses the objective:
To figure out what they mean by that, we can look at their Runway Incursion Avoidance material, which says:
Finally, after landing and upon exiting the runway, ensure your aircraft has completely crossed over the runway hold markings. Once all parts of the aircraft have crossed the runway holding position markings, you must hold unless further instructions have been issued by ATC. Do not initiate non-essential communications or actions until the aircraft has stopped and the brakes set.
Raise the flaps after leaving the runway.
And the biggest reason:
That instructor got on your case, I know examiners that will take exception to touching the flaps on the runway and I can say for certain any OE Captain or APD will really get on your case for doing it. Start proper habits now, particularly if you aspire to fly anything bigger than a light single.
Raising the flaps right after touchdown. Good or Bad? -- The answer is an emphatic Yes.
The major reason for not raising your flaps until you've cleared the runway and come to a stop is that it's one more thing for the pilot to do in an already workload-intensive period (landing). As others have pointed out you might hit the wrong control or otherwise mess up in a way that can ruin your day.
As a matter of general procedure I was taught not to raise the flaps until clear of the runway for normal landings, and that's what I do. It seems the safest way to operate since there's always plenty of time to do things after you've cleared the runway and stopped.
The major reason for raising the flaps while you're still on the runway is, as you pointed out in your question, better breaking performance - I don't know about for the Cessna 182, but it's mentioned as part of the short field procedures in the Cherokee POH:
There will be less chance of skidding the tires if the flaps are retracted before applying the brakes.
They're not saying "retract the flaps", but they're certainly waggling their eyebrows suggestively while pointing at the flap lever and mouthing "save your tires".
Empirically (yeah, I tested it, I'm strange like that) retracting the flaps on the Cherokee makes a small but appreciable difference in stopping distance (and a noticeable difference in how hard I can hit the brakes before the tires protest), so when I'm landing on an actual short field or drilling short-field procedures I retract the flaps during rollout at about the same point I would in a touch-and-go landing.
I say bad for some planes. Also other planes it will be bad in some conditions. So follow what the operations manual says for that plane.
Using full flaps is a very high drag and very poor L/D ratio configuration for the plane to be in. By raising flaps the potential increase in tire grip (from reduced lift) for braking is offset partially or entirely by the reduction in aerodynamic drag. There will be a speed threshold somewhere that will mean fully retracted flaps provides more braking than full flaps, but don't forget you have to transition from fully extended to retracted giving you a surge in your L/D ratio. Remember that takeoff flaps setting gives better L/D ratio than no flaps at that speed and AoA.
All of those things changing during landing does not lend itself to smooth, predictable, and easier controlled deceleration. Plus, as others have pointed out, retracting your flaps partway through a landing distracts you from your task at hand, and for limited or no benefit or even, worse braking performance.
Edit: The better braking performance with flaps up may be true for some planes but not for all "light" tricycle single engine aircraft. This will depend on many design factors that the operation manual authors choose to use the KISS principal and just say always continue the rollout with the full flaps until you're off the runway or parked.
During rollout the wings may transition from flying to fully stalled due to the reduced air speed while on full flaps. This will be a sever reduction in lift, that greatly enhances tire grip, while at the same time has all of the drag as before. If the flaps are retracted in this sort of plane at that stage the wings may go back to flying while at the same time reducing the amount of drag (giving the surge in L/D). This surge will be particularly bad during the transition from full to no flaps. Even though there will not be enough lift to make any wheels come up, it will reduce the tire grip. That reduction in grip could cause one of the rear wheels to skid, suddenly reducing the braking performance of one side of the aircraft and cause the plane to spin around. Depending on the speed you're going when your nose gear touches down and you decide to retract the flaps, this could be very bad. Even if that extreme doesn't happen, the the loss of tire grip at the same time as a reduction in drag from the flaps means less braking performance.
In the planes the OP flies their wings may remain flying (not stalled) for the "high" speed part of the rollout that aerodynamic forces are significant, so retracting the flaps severely reduces the lift and a bit of drag, giving the tires much more grip and braking power than any loss of aerodynamic braking provided by the flaps.
I say raise the flaps (for the advantages that you enunciated), as long as you first make sure that:
That would probably not be directly after touchdown, but maybe a little later. So basically, make an informed action depending on the aircraft and the situation.
Thanks to all those who answered. Lots of interesting and useful information here.
You say that you don't even think about 'flipping the lever'. Well, that means that you missed something very basic in flying habits. Raising the flaps means - moving that relevant lever AND making sure that they are up - either visually or by indicator. This you should not be doing while taxiing and definitely not ON the runway. Just like when you take of you apply full power - which means - you push the throttle all the way in AND check you have max RPM and all you engine gauges are green.
My answer is a definite - No.
This question is about light, tricycle, single engine aircraft. I have made it a habit to raise the flaps right after touchdown (when the nosewheel is on the ground). My instructor used to do... of fiddling with the flaps lever (which is a something I don't even have to think about) My question is: Is it really a bad idea to raise the flaps that soon after landing? Or is it actually a good habit? (I... on a C182 that I wanted to rent in Florida and when I raised the flaps right after touchdown the instructor shouted "what the < beep > are you doing? You should never raise the flaps until you've
flaps down. After the wheels were on the runway he relaxed, never realizing that a plane is not landed until the switches are cut. Because he still had airspeed and because full flaps lowered the take-off speed, a small gust of wind was all that he needed to begin flying again. The additional lift was enough to raise him 10 feet from the runway, and at that point he ran out of gust... to taxi doesn't help slow the plane very much, and flaps do constitute a hazard in gusts. Besides, it is surprising how much a small pebble costs when it goes through a flap. Is he right
this to happen? (My guess is it is CG related) And most importantly: If I would have continued this "mushing" flight, would it be possible to have entered a flat spin or a simple "drop out of the sky.... This "mushing" went on for what seemed ages before I eventually applied power and pushed the nose down to gain airspeed again. We tried it again after that and the same thing happened. I had an instructor...When I took delivery of a new Cessna 182T last year, I did a test flight for certification purposes. During the test flight we had to perform a power off stall but that didn't go as planned
clearance to land. After landing, I still had no idea I had done anything incorrectly as the controller made no indication to me. A few hours after I landed, my CFI sent me a text message asking me how...Here's the scenario: I was a student pilot on inbound for landing at my home airport on my final solo cross country flight I needed before doing a checkride. At roughly 8 miles out to the north west, I established contact with the tower and was told to "enter left base, runway 7, report 3 miles out." I interpreted the "report 3 miles out" as to give the tower a call when I was 3 miles away from
So the answer in my mind is "of course pilots can fly circling approaches at non-towered airports" (seriously, I could swear that I've done it before, but then again I can't think of any specific examples....). That is, until I ran across this little tidbit in the Air Traffic Control Order while researching another question: 4-8-6. CIRCLING APPROACH a. Circling approach instructions may only be given for aircraft landing at airports with operational control towers. So then the question becomes, why do they have circling minimums at non-towered airports?? No tower here. ATC
I have a question regarding this Missed Approach Procedure Im in my final approach segment and reach DME 1.1 and the runway is not in sight so I start my Missed approach, how should it be executed? Since I have to hold I'd start a tear drop entry turning to heading 125° and then left turn intercepting 275° course inbound. This option sounds viable to me I first do a right 360° as charted (???) and going to the VOR and then starting probably a parallel entry into the hold. This doesn't sound viable to me Textual description is also clear about that 360° If it 1.) why would they chart
Anecdotally I have heard of various things that I can do to make steel brakes last longer before they have to be replaced, and they make sense but how much does it really help? Things that I have heard: Land at the minimum recommend speed Use maximum reverse thrust (if you have it) Delay braking after landing (if on a sufficiently long runway) to allow slowing before brake application Various taxi techniques (taxi on one engine, don't ride the brakes, but instead build up speed and then brake to slow down. Rinse and repeat.) Are there any studies that have been done to show how much
of the date of examination shown on the medical certificate. So this clearly states that if I pass my medical on January 1st 2014 then my medical is good until the end of the day on January 31st 2015. ICAO Rule: However, I have been told that ICAO rules state that the medical expires 12 months to the day from when it was issued, which would mean that it would no longer be valid as of January 1st, 2015. (A reference for this would be great.) Question: As the holder of an FAA pilot license, with the above FAA issued medical, may I legally fly outside of the US after January 1st 2015
Here are a few thoughts: 'Real' accidents happen much too seldom to be of any real measure, and they would have to be compensated for the number of passenger kilometers as well to be objective. Large airlines may have be involved in more accidents, but they have more aircraft. Many airlines low down on the reports had accidents many years ago. Avherald and the like may be good sources but emphasize that they don't report on all accidents. Different jurisdictions have different reporting requirements. What is a fair and unbiased method of measuring airline safety?
translate to a deflection of the surfaces, mimicking the "old" mechanical control setup. It is my understanding that this is the design choice of Boeing in its new aircrafts. I do not wish to discuss... or Airbus/Boeing certified pilots or even pure civil/(former) military pilots. Does any of you have any reference? ...Provided an aircraft with a fly-by-wire system, there are basically two possible choices when it comes deciding how to let the pilots interface with it: rate control / attitude hold: a deflection