I often fly the PMDG 737-800 (with winglets) in my home simulator and most of the times, I find it hard to slow the aircraft down for landing when I descend. Most of the time, I need to deploy the speedbrakes to keep descending without increasing speed. I usually start my descent earlier than the marked top of descent point to make the flight a little smoother.
So I was wondering if this is a bug or if the real aircraft actually behaves like this. I have wondered about this for some time. I can only dream about becoming a pilot and find out myself cause of my bad eyesight.
Here is a video of me landing the 737 where i had to deploy speedbreaks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BGL5lH-VXY
Since this video is getting a little outdated: I can no longer tell exactly the payload or weight of this aircraft. But i normally fly with heavy payload.
I have not flown the 737, but I can tell you that jets in general have a relatively low amount of drag (they are very "clean"). This makes them hard to slow down and they build up speed easily and quickly. The 737-800 is a Next Generation 737, and has the updated wing that includes (among other enhancements) winglets, so this problem would be even more prevalent than on the classic 737's.
Slowing down and going down at the same time is very hard to do in airplanes like this, and use of spoilers is almost always required when the airplane is in a clean configuration if you need to do both. Descent planning is an important part of flight in such aircraft.
Until someone with more authority steps in...
I have a friend who flies 737's and he has mentioned several times how well they glide and how difficult they are to slow down. He tries really hard to not to use the speedbrakes because "they just shake the plane" making an uncomfortable experience for the passengers. They simply manage this "problem" (actually a really good thing in terms of fuel burn) by planning the descent properly, and always starting down early enough to not require spoilers.
I can't speak as to the accuracy of PMDG, but I would guess the performance you're seeing is at least roughly similar to real world, and it's your descent planning which needs adjusting. What surprises me is that the FMS wouldn't automatically select a reasonable top of descent, but perhaps there is a difference between how you are flying the descent and how the FMS expected it to be flown.
You haven't provided everything possible to really ascertain the issue noted, but based on what you have I've noticed the following things:
You'll find most 737s at 240-250 KIAS passing through 10000 feet, rather than the 220 knots that you were going at (while 220 KIAS is above minimum clean speed at normal landing weights, it's still slower than most)
Being heavy actually makes minimum drag and max L/D speeds higher, which means that for the same speed, you'll actually descend at less of a gradient than if you were lighter
The Boeing 737-800W has a idle descent ratio of about 1:20, which means that at 250 knots you're only going to be descending about 1200fpm -- the 737-800 (especially with winglets) is a very slick bird.
For your reference, you can see the distances required for an idle descent (.78/280/250), plus allowances for a straight-in approach:
|=====================================================| | | | | DISTANCE (NM) | | PRESSURE | | |---------------------------| | ALTITUDE | TIME | FUEL | LANDING WEIGHT (1000 KG) | | (FT) | (MIN) | (KG) | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | |----------|-------|------|------|------|------|------| | 41000 | 27 | 340 | 102 | 119 | 133 | 142 | | 39000 | 26 | 340 | 97 | 114 | 127 | 136 | | 37000 | 25 | 330 | 92 | 108 | 121 | 130 | | 35000 | 24 | 330 | 88 | 103 | 116 | 125 | | 33000 | 24 | 320 | 84 | 99 | 111 | 120 | | 31000 | 23 | 320 | 80 | 94 | 105 | 113 | | 29000 | 22 | 310 | 75 | 88 | 98 | 106 | | 27000 | 21 | 300 | 70 | 82 | 92 | 99 | | 25000 | 20 | 300 | 66 | 77 | 86 | 92 | | 23000 | 19 | 290 | 61 | 71 | 79 | 85 | | 21000 | 18 | 280 | 57 | 66 | 73 | 78 | | 19000 | 17 | 270 | 52 | 61 | 67 | 72 | | 17000 | 15 | 250 | 48 | 55 | 61 | 65 | | 15000 | 14 | 240 | 44 | 50 | 55 | 58 | | 10000 | 11 | 200 | 30 | 34 | 37 | 39 | | 5000 | 7 | 150 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | | 1500 | 4 | 110 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |=====================================================|
if this is a bug or if the real aircraft actually behaves like this. I have wondered about this for some time. I can only dream about becoming a pilot and find out myself cause of my bad eyesight. Here is a video of me landing the 737 where i had to deploy speedbreaks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BGL5lH-VXY Since this video is getting a little outdated: I can no longer tell exactly the payload or weight...I often fly the PMDG 737-800 (with winglets) in my home simulator and most of the times, I find it hard to slow the aircraft down for landing when I descend. Most of the time, I need to deploy
In the first part of this YouTube video, you can see an aircraft supposedly flying 4x faster than the surrounding aircraft, at the time the Malaysian 777 went missing. After replaying this on Flight Radar 24, KAL672 departs Kuala Lumpa a short while before MAS370. It then does a 180, flies back towards the airport, then appears to do another 180 and rockets across the ocean: Here are the playback links for 2014-03-07 16:55: KAL672 and MAS370. Essentially, my question is, what is this oddity that FR24 is showing? (to ward off conspiracy theorist nuts).
This video shows a Hawker jet with the wing fluttering up and down like it's about to break. What can cause flutter like that? Can it actually cause a wing or stabilizer failure? How can flutter be prevented? What should be done if something like this happens?
Is it just my imagination, or is it a fact that many large airliners actually touch down "crabbed" on difficult crosswind landings? Here's what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE (watch at 01:10) Or this: Is the main landing gear specifically designed to allow this? Is it recommended or discouraged by the manufacturer?
Watching a video entitled Airbus A330 Takeoff Sidestick View, there appears to be a lot of side-to-side movement of the sidestick, as well as a lot of pushing the nose down: I was under the impression that movements on the control column should be smooth and not erratic — what is the reason for the side-to-side movement? As far as I can see on the MFDs, there is no heading change prior...? This landing video appears to show even more erratic control. Is this normal?
Watching a video on YouTube of an A340-600 takeoff, I noticed that it has at least two exterior cameras — one for lining up the nosewheel, and the other on the tailfin: After the NTSB recommended the use of exterior cameras in 2012, I'm wondering how widespread these are? Which models of Airbus aircraft have them? Do any Boeings? For bonus points, do these record or are they realtime-only?
Something that just popped into my head: I've been on a few easyJet and Ryanair flights where a lot of passengers clap and cheer on touchdown. Would the pilots be able to hear this? Here's an example I found by searching YouTube: It seems pretty commonplace... but can the pilots hear them? I guess it would be distracting. Just something I was wondering!
Recently, the crew of an Indian airline performed a short choreographed dance sequence mid-flight on the occasion of Holi. This is, a not so rare practice amongst low-cost Indian carriers, who organize such dance sequences to celebrate special festivals (since festivals are a huge part of Indian culture, plus publicity for the airline afterwards). Here is a YouTube video. One of the pilots can be seen recording the dance on his camera. SpiceJet specially planned this event, and had extra cabin crew on-board the flight as a precaution. Also, during the dance, one of the pilots
wait a bit longer, but knowing myself, if I hadn't thought about it ahead of time I'd probably switch right away. The only reason I can think of for saying it this way is if 27 R is not an active... to switch to ground frequency with this clearance (assume I just landed)? N12345, right on E, cross 27 R, contact ground .9 Should I call ground (or switch frequency, so I no longer hear the tower) before or after crossing 27 R? My by-the-book assumption would be immediately, as there's no "then" or "after crossing" or similar, but somehow that feels wrong. I suppose normally it doesn't
Some light aircraft now have airframe parachutes. If a pilot does have to pull the chute on a Cirrus (for example), is the aircraft flyable or at least repairable after landing or is it a write-off? What G forces are involved in the impact? I realize that there are lots of possible variables here, but let's assume that the parachute deploys correctly and in plenty of time for a stabilized descent; touchdown is in 'ideal' conditions, i.e. on level, unobstructed ground; and impact forces are as described in the Cirrus CAPS guide: The airplane will assume its touchdown attitude to optimize