Is it just my imagination, or is it a fact that many large airliners actually touch down "crabbed" on difficult crosswind landings?
Here's what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE (watch at 01:10)
Is the main landing gear specifically designed to allow this? Is it recommended or discouraged by the manufacturer?
The landing gear is indeed designed to cope with crabbed crosswind landings.
The recommendation is to avoid crab on landing however in severe crosswind conditions it is sometimes impossible to decrab completely without introducing excessive bank. Therefore some residual crab has to be allowed.
Airbus recommends less then 5 degrees of residual crab on landing, but aircraft are designed to cope with more.
An exceptional design is found in the B-52, where the main landing gear can rotated to be aligned with the direction of travel to deal with extreme crab angles.
Is it just my imagination, or is it a fact that many large airliners actually touch down "crabbed" on difficult crosswind landings? Here's what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE (watch at 01:10) Or this: Is the main landing gear specifically designed to allow this? Is it recommended or discouraged by the manufacturer?
Some light aircraft now have airframe parachutes. If a pilot does have to pull the chute on a Cirrus (for example), is the aircraft flyable or at least repairable after landing or is it a write-off? What G forces are involved in the impact? I realize that there are lots of possible variables here, but let's assume that the parachute deploys correctly and in plenty of time for a stabilized...). The airframe, seats and landing gear are all designed to absorb the impact energy.
Something that just popped into my head: I've been on a few easyJet and Ryanair flights where a lot of passengers clap and cheer on touchdown. Would the pilots be able to hear this? Here's an example I found by searching YouTube: It seems pretty commonplace... but can the pilots hear them? I guess it would be distracting. Just something I was wondering!
In aeroelasticity, there are three main phenomena that one should take care of: divergence, aileron reversal and flutter. Each of them has an associated speed at which the phenomenon might start to occur. During wind-tunnel tests it is possible to increase the flutter speed to have access to the divergence speed first by using some small masses smartly placed on the wing. This is due to the fact that usually flutter speed is smaller than divergence speed. Is it always the case for aircraft (without additional masses on the wing)? If not do you have any example? If yes do you have
In the first part of this YouTube video, you can see an aircraft supposedly flying 4x faster than the surrounding aircraft, at the time the Malaysian 777 went missing. After replaying this on Flight Radar 24, KAL672 departs Kuala Lumpa a short while before MAS370. It then does a 180, flies back towards the airport, then appears to do another 180 and rockets across the ocean: Here are the playback links for 2014-03-07 16:55: KAL672 and MAS370. Essentially, my question is, what is this oddity that FR24 is showing? (to ward off conspiracy theorist nuts).
This question is somewhat related to this other one. I listened to this exchange between a helicopter and Newark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHNvXPbZ7WI The helicopter wants to land at Newark. The controller tells the helicopter to remain clear of the Class B. I'm aware that the controllers must give clearance to operate in certain classes of airspace, and the helicopter wasn't granted clearance to do so. Why was the helicopter denied (as far as can be deduced)? What should the pilot have done differently, either to get clearance to land at Newark or to anticipate not being able to?
if this is a bug or if the real aircraft actually behaves like this. I have wondered about this for some time. I can only dream about becoming a pilot and find out myself cause of my bad eyesight. Here is a video of me landing the 737 where i had to deploy speedbreaks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BGL5lH-VXY Since this video is getting a little outdated: I can no longer tell exactly the payload or weight...I often fly the PMDG 737-800 (with winglets) in my home simulator and most of the times, I find it hard to slow the aircraft down for landing when I descend. Most of the time, I need to deploy
This video shows a Hawker jet with the wing fluttering up and down like it's about to break. What can cause flutter like that? Can it actually cause a wing or stabilizer failure? How can flutter be pr...
Watching a video entitled Airbus A330 Takeoff Sidestick View, there appears to be a lot of side-to-side movement of the sidestick, as well as a lot of pushing the nose down: I was under the impression that movements on the control column should be smooth and not erratic — what is the reason for the side-to-side movement? As far as I can see on the MFDs, there is no heading change prior to 02:50 (which appears to be done by the A/P anyway). Is it turbulence? Also, what is the reason for pushing the nose down? Is the plane naturally trying to pull up at too high of an angle
The landing gear should be down in order to qualify as a stabilized approach. Other than that, what are the guidelines on when to deploy landing gear on approach?