Is it safe to use a parallel runway's PAPI/VASI?

Geoffrey Gallaway
  • Is it safe to use a parallel runway's PAPI/VASI? Geoffrey Gallaway

    Many airports have parallel runways but only one runway has a PAPI/VASI. If both runways start at the same point and have similar touch-down points, is it safe to use the parallel runway's lights for the approach and landing?

  • It is considered "safe" for a pilot to use all available information to safely conduct a flight. This does not exclude using other references, such as a parallel PAPI as a means to cross-check.

    However, it is not legal to use a parallel PAPI as your primary guidance. If there were to be an incident, and you were to tell an investigator, "the parallel PAPI indicated that I was on the GS", he'd think you were a bit nutty, and fault you.

    If instead, you were able to tell him "I was properly lined up for the Left, and then cross-checked with the PAPI on the Right, which also indicated a stabilized approach on the GS", he might commend you for creative cross-checking.

  • Not necessarily. The PAPI is installed, and the angle is set for the obstacles in the approach path for that specific runway. There could be obstacles on the parallel that the other PAPI would not give you clearance over because it was never surveyed for that.

  • Per the AIM (2-1-2 - Visual Glideslope Indicators)

    The visual glide path of the PAPI typically provides safe obstruction clearance within plus or minus 10 degrees of the extended runway centerline and to 4 SM from the runway threshold.

    (Deviations from that are supposed to be noted in the Airport/Facility Directory, for example if the clearance path is offset from the centerline, or theoretically if you could use a parallel PAPI...)

    A few miles out you're probably within the 10 degree arc, so the PAPI will be useful, but as you get closer that arc narrows, and as Lnafziger mentioned there might be an obstacle in your way (like the FAA-Standard 50-foot tree right at the threshold line).
    Also as abelenky pointed out you're not supposed to be using parallel PAPIs/VASIs for approach guidance - It's a good cross-check, but not a primary reference.

Related questions and answers
  • Many airports have parallel runways but only one runway has a PAPI/VASI. If both runways start at the same point and have similar touch-down points, is it safe to use the parallel runway's lights for the approach and landing?

  • A few times, when flying into SFO, me and my fellow passengers were informed that due to foggy weather one of two parallel runways there is closed, causing delays. So, a few questions: Why can only one runway be used during fog? During an instrument landing, if the instruments are precise enough to land the plane exactly in the middle of one runway, then surely they are precise enough to differentiate between two runways? Is this standard practice in all airports or something specific to SFO? Is there some minimum distance between parallel runways above which it is safe to keep them both

  • I'm very interested to learn if there are (m)any (major) (commercial) airports that have runways further away from the terminal(s) than Schiphol's Polderbaan. Which airport is "in the lead" in this respect? The northern end of the Polderbaan, the last runway to be constructed, is 7 km (4.3 mi) north of the control tower, causing taxi times of up to 20 minutes to the terminal. [...] Newest runway, opened 2003. Located to reduce the noise impact on the surrounding population; aircraft have a lengthy 15-minute taxi to and from the Terminal. Wikipedia

  • A popular airport near me (KMYF) has two parallel runways, 28/10 R/L and a crosswind runway, 5/23. Almost always, 28R/L is in use. I'm sure they knew that there was generally a sea breeze in the area, and the wind typically will be right down the runway or within 10-20 degrees of centerline. I'm sure they do prevailing wind study for the area, and my questions are about the study: what are there some specifications for the study? Does the study vary in length depending on location? Is there a standard study that they use, and do they test things like average temperature during the study

  • I've never had the opportunity to fly into a controlled airport with parallel runways, so I've never actually faced the situation. But, in the interest of being ahead of it, when would it be prudent to switch to ground frequency with this clearance (assume I just landed)? N12345, right on E, cross 27 R, contact ground .9 Should I call ground (or switch frequency, so I no longer hear the tower) before or after crossing 27 R? My by-the-book assumption would be immediately, as there's no "then" or "after crossing" or similar, but somehow that feels wrong. I suppose normally it doesn't

  • Let's say I call up Wx and have the wind direction and I know the runway headings from my charts and the pattern is empty. I can do the math, but it's tedious and slow and even worse when there are multiple runways. This is what I usually do: Runways are 13 and 31 Wind is 253° which rounds to 25 $25-13=12$ $31-25=6$ I'm going to use Runway 31 Is there a trick to determine best runway quickly without doing the math?

  • I have a question regarding this Missed Approach Procedure Im in my final approach segment and reach DME 1.1 and the runway is not in sight so I start my Missed approach, how should it be executed? Since I have to hold I'd start a tear drop entry turning to heading 125° and then left turn intercepting 275° course inbound. This option sounds viable to me I first do a right 360° as charted (???) and going to the VOR and then starting probably a parallel entry into the hold. This doesn't sound viable to me Textual description is also clear about that 360° If it 1.) why would they chart

  • Let's say we have a Cessna 150 or some other lightweight two seater and no chance to land with head wind for whatever reason. We're trying to land with a constant tailwind of 7 knots. I would try to land as close to stall speed as possible to compensate the tailwind. So much for the theory. In reality, the wind is not constant. If I'm close to stall, dying wind will give me trouble. What's a general good approach for such situations? What configuration would you choose? If the runway is very long, one can just go faster. But often, runways are rather short.

  • I'm not a professional pilot, just an enthusiast, so this might seem obvious to others; but I noticed that airports don't use sequential numbering for runways, starting from 1. Liverpool (for example) has runway 9/27; so how are these numbers assigned? Also, what do Left and Right signify?

  • Anecdotally I have heard of various things that I can do to make steel brakes last longer before they have to be replaced, and they make sense but how much does it really help? Things that I have heard: Land at the minimum recommend speed Use maximum reverse thrust (if you have it) Delay braking after landing (if on a sufficiently long runway) to allow slowing before brake application Various taxi techniques (taxi on one engine, don't ride the brakes, but instead build up speed and then brake to slow down. Rinse and repeat.) Are there any studies that have been done to show how much

Data information