In class D and E airspace, there is no separation between IFR and VFR traffic. However, most airspace in the United States below 18,500 feet MSL is class E airspace, which is exactly where non-pressurized aircraft cruise when flying IFR.
My question is not about regulation (that's perfectly clear: no separation between IFR/VFR) but I'm curious to learn how safe it actually is when cruising at 10,000 feet in VMC on an IFR flight plan while in class E airspace. I'm pretty sure many pilots will be on autopilot without taking too much notice of what's happening outside but according to the regulations the pilot is still responsible for seeing and avoiding other VFR traffic.
Are there any accident statistics on this? I have read hundreds of accident reports over the last few years and I can't remember ever seeing a report on a midair collision between IFR and VFR aircraft in class E.
I'm pretty sure 99% of pilots will be on autopilot without taking too much notice of what's happening outside but according to the regulations the pilot is still responsible for seeing and avoiding other VFR traffic.
Well, shame on the pilots, then. Put down your iPads and do your job. It is "see and avoid". Perhaps they have some automation in the cockpit to help them like TIS or TCAS etc. but it is their responsibility to avoid a collision - period. And the old Mark I eyeball is frequently the only way to accomplish that task.
To answer your question more directly, the system works pretty well. I don't have statistics but I do know that we would read a lot about it in the press if collisions happened regularly.
As with any flight, "It's as safe as you make it".
The vast majority of the General Aviation fleet (piston singles) don't even have an autopilot, and the ones that do may only be single-axis units (wing levelers), so the pilot has to have some level of attention on flying the airplane.
If we assume these are the folks flying around VFR we can also generally assume they should be looking out the window the vast majority of the time (like Skip said, "Put down your iPads and do your job.")
Adding to that, "See and avoid" is every pilot's responsibility in VMC - whether operating under Visual Flight Rules or Instrument Flight Rules - if you can see, you are expected to avoid (and if necessary deal with ATC freaking out about you deviating from a clearance later).
A number of other steps have been taken to enhance safety in Class D and E airspace:
In the US FAR 91.159 prescribes specific VFR cruising altitudes, and FAR 91.179 is the IFR equivalent.
The cruising altitudes in these regulations result in an automatic 500-foot vertical separation of VFR and IFR traffic (at least between 3,000 feet MSL and 18,000 feet MSL - which is where VFR and IFR traffic are likely to be mixing in cruise. ).
Additionally IFR traffic is usually receiving radar separation services (there are some non-radar areas in the US, but not many). Nominally this separation is "IFR-to-IFR" in Class E airspace, but if a controller sees a VFR target squawking 1200 and behaving unpredictably they can vector IFR traffic around it.
Similarly if a controller sees a "primary target only" (something without a transponder, and not reporting altitude information) they will often vector IFR traffic around it until they can establish what it is and what it's doing.
Within class D airspace the level of service you'll get depends somewhat on the equipment the controllers have. A "purely visual" tower with no radar can only give traffic advisories for aircraft they can see by looking out their window, but if they see an conflict they're going to say something. A tower with radar (either local or slaved from a nearby airport) may give give VFR-to-VFR or VFR-to-IFR separation advisories based on that data as well, sometimes including advisories to aircraft inbound who are outside their airspace.
In class D and E airspace, there is no separation between IFR and VFR traffic. However, most airspace in the United States below 18,500 feet MSL is class E airspace, which is exactly where non-pressurized aircraft cruise when flying IFR. My question is not about regulation (that's perfectly clear: no separation between IFR/VFR) but I'm curious to learn how safe it actually is when cruising... can't remember ever seeing a report on a midair collision between IFR and VFR aircraft in class E.
Hi – Here’s the scenario: The flight starts night VFR, with broken ceiling at destination (class C airspace) and expected to improve according to the pre-flight abbreviated briefing. I'm IFR... on the ground/view of rwy)? c). other? BTW: I did read How do you request a "pop up" IFR clearance? . In my scenario I have the time to call FSS, there is no emergency, I'm on flight following...): a). do I ask approach directly for the IFR clearance, and what is the officially sanctionned phraseology? Also: do I have to cancel IFR when I’m on the ground/see the runway i.e. is the clearance
So every once in awhile I see an article talking about the air traffic control strikes in Europe like this one: European air traffic controllers to strike. How does this affect me if I am flying to Europe? Do they just close the doors and all airspace becomes uncontrolled airspace? I'm guessing not, but that's what I envision when I hear that! What happens if they go on strike while I'm over the ocean on my way there?
I once had a traffic controller give me a hard time about how I requested IFR clearance once in the air. I had previously filed an IFR flight plan, and took off from my untowered home airport. On approach control's frequency, I said: Tampa Approach, Cirrus 123AB, 5 miles southeast of Tampa Exec at 1000 feet, IFR to Ft. Lauderdale Exec The approach controller responded, annoyed, saying something like "Well do you have an IFR flight plan or are you reporting IFR??" I had always used that phraseology because it seems the least wordy way to get the info across, which can be helpful when
an issue and ask ATC if they need to change course? This is mostly focused on IFR traffic, but how different would VFR be? The situation could be that ATC clears you for a certain maneuver, and other...ATC will sometimes give pilots the instruction to maintain visual separation from nearby traffic. I have a couple questions about this: There is a related question here about traffic separation. Is the required separation in this case different, and how can they judge this? (I would like a bit more detail for this specific case than was provided on the answer there) Normally pilots
This question is somewhat related to this other one. I listened to this exchange between a helicopter and Newark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHNvXPbZ7WI The helicopter wants to land at Newark. The controller tells the helicopter to remain clear of the Class B. I'm aware that the controllers must give clearance to operate in certain classes of airspace, and the helicopter wasn't granted clearance to do so. Why was the helicopter denied (as far as can be deduced)? What should the pilot have done differently, either to get clearance to land at Newark or to anticipate not being able to?
Primary target: An aircraft not reporting mode-C, the only thing the controller has is the return on the radar. When a controller reports a primary target as traffic to other aircraft, the controller does not have the altitude of the target. Given this, I conclude that ATC radar does not have the altitude (angle-up) to the target, and only provides azimuth. So then without the altitude, how... miles out. However, if the target is at 15,000ft, the proper position would be 9.5 miles out. Since the difference is so small, does the radar just put the target at 10 miles, and the FAA separation
I'm from Brazil, and here we use the West/East rule, so we use an odd flight level when we fly between 0/360 - 179, and when we fly between 180 - 359 we fly in an even flight level. But what should you do in other countries? Where I can find those rules? I've heard that in Europe it's totally different, and that in some countries in Asia they use meters, instead of feet. Where can I find this information?
If conditions at a towered airport are not IFR, can pilots request a special VFR clearance? For example, at a Class D airport, ceiling 1300 broken, 10 sm visibility is technically too low to remain in the pattern (assuming a 1000 foot AGL pattern and maintaining at least 500 feet below clouds), yet it is not IFR. With a Special VFR clearance, the pilot would be able to maintain a 1000 foot pattern and remain clear of clouds. If the pilot requests SVFR, will the tower grant it?
was in Bravo, and to turn West and exit. I did say, "Am I not ABOVE Bravo airspace?" He said "No, you're in it" and to fly West and exit. From that moment, I followed approach control's directions to a T, but could not understand why he directed me West (remaining in Class B for 13 more miles) instead of having me climb 1,500 feet or angle back North or North-West to exit Bravo more quickly. I was given...I just flew into Bravo unintentionally 48 hours ago. My error: I thought I was 1,500 feet above the ceiling, but I was 1,000 feet below it. Furthermore, I had an incorrect frequency for Approach