A popular airport near me (KMYF) has two parallel runways, 28/10 R/L and a crosswind runway, 5/23. Almost always, 28R/L is in use. I'm sure they knew that there was generally a sea breeze in the area, and the wind typically will be right down the runway or within 10-20 degrees of centerline.
I'm sure they do prevailing wind study for the area, and my questions are about the study: what are there some specifications for the study? Does the study vary in length depending on location? Is there a standard study that they use, and do they test things like average temperature during the study to determine runway length (to maximize utility during high density altitude operations)?
FAA AC 150/5300-13A ("Airport Design") talks a little about this (you want Appendix 2, "Wind Analysis").
Basically you start by figuring out what kind of aircraft you want to operate at the airport, and establishing some basic wind limits (specifically, the maximum crosswind and tailwind components you want to deal with).
Then you call up NOAA's "National Climate Data Center", tell them where you're looking to build your airport, and see if they can have wind data for the location you're looking to build on.
If NOAA doesn't have data you have a couple of other options -- another nearby airport's wind analysis can be used (if the topography doesn't vary that much and the wind analysis is "recent"), or you may have to perform a wind survey which basically means placing a anemometers on the site to record the wind speed and direction for a year.
Armed with collected wind data you tally up the number of observations in given wind speed ranges and mark them down on a "wind rose".
You then place your runway(s) on the wind rose so that they're aligned with the prevailing winds and determine your "wind coverage" - the amount of time the winds at your site are within your crosswind and tailwind limits.
The advisory circular I linked to shows you how to do this by hand, but there's also software to do this which is how most folks do it. The FAA even has a handy web form which will generate the wind rose and runway/crosswind limit bars for you.
Note that this is just the wind part. As you've alluded to there are a number of other considerations, like terrain: If the prevailing winds favor runway 36, but runway 36 points right at a mountain a mile from the field you might have to align the runway 33 or 03 and sacrifice a perfect headwind for not having pilots fly into the mountain.
Also as ratchet mentioned the airspace around your proposed site may influence your runway layout and types of operations. There's a separate FAA office that deals with "Obstruction Evaluation and Airspace analysis" and a process to go through to ensure that your airport is not deemed "Objectionable".
Also as you alluded to in your question there are other considerations like density altitude (local temperature and humidity trends) which will influence design factors like runway length - there's another advisory circular (AC 150/5325-4B) that talks about runway design criteria, including length considerations.
For even more than you ever wanted to know about airport design you can check out the full 150-series of Advisory Circulars, which all deal with airports in some way (there are ACs on design, construction, markings, lighting, ARFF, and even how to qualify for and obtain federal aid).
A popular airport near me (KMYF) has two parallel runways, 28/10 R/L and a crosswind runway, 5/23. Almost always, 28R/L is in use. I'm sure they knew that there was generally a sea breeze in the area, and the wind typically will be right down the runway or within 10-20 degrees of centerline. I'm sure they do prevailing wind study for the area, and my questions are about the study: what are there some specifications for the study? Does the study vary in length depending on location? Is there a standard study that they use, and do they test things like average temperature during the study
) format Calculates enroute wind and temperature for up to 50 airport pairs at a time. Calculates enroute wind and temperature for simple great circle tracks or tracks with up to 250 waypoints, with or without altitude changes. Calculates average enroute wind and temperature or any reliability (quantile) between 50% and 99%. Months or seasons, reliabilities, altitudes, and speeds may...There are various services that use world-wide Boeing Winds for forecast wind data which can be used to calculate an approximate flight time between two locations. They usually have best case, worst
The airlines are always trying to jam more passengers into each plane. I'm smaller than today's average, and I'm still often uncomfortable in a standard Economy seat. It occurred to me that in the current design, there's a great deal of space wasted over the passengers' heads. And that many of us passengers already do our best to sleep through flights. Hence my question: Is there any reason... (or cargo restraint webbing? I'm not sure I'm joking) could handle the remaining risk. No, I don't really think it would be commercially viable ... but I'm wondering whether folks who actually Know
ground level. Although I don't see any obstructions that high during this segment of the approach, as far as I know instrument approaches are supposed to guarantee a 500 ft obstacle clearance, do...Non-precision instrument approaches generally have altitude restrictions which get lower when you get closer to the airport. I always figured these restrictions were AMSL using the current altimeter setting, not compensating for temperature. Some have heard the mnemonic that mountains are higher come wintertime, which basically means that colder weather make your altimeter read higher than you
Let's say I call up Wx and have the wind direction and I know the runway headings from my charts and the pattern is empty. I can do the math, but it's tedious and slow and even worse when there are multiple runways. This is what I usually do: Runways are 13 and 31 Wind is 253° which rounds to 25 $25-13=12$ $31-25=6$ I'm going to use Runway 31 Is there a trick to determine best runway quickly without doing the math?
short of the far end of the runway (which, btw, ends in a cliff. Just to heighten the suspense). I'm sure they had their reason, so I'm not going to question them. I just wanted to use it as a set up for this question: If you accidentally touch down on a runway that is borderline long enough to stop your aircraft on, how would you determine if you wanted to either stop or just do a touch and go...I was reading another question earlier when I noticed a story about a 737-700 that landed at M. Graham Clark Downtown Airport in downtown Branson Missouri. The runway is only 3738 ft, long, which
FAR 135.385 requires that at your destination airport your flight planning shows that you could make a full-stop landing "within 60 percent of the effective length" of the runway when flying transport-category turbine-powered aircraft. For piston-powered aircraft FAR 135.377 has a similar 70% rule. How do you calculate minimum runway lengths under these rules? Can you use 80% of the runway? What if the runway is wet?
In a flight database that I'm working with on a project, there is a column of data called "flightCategory" with values "C", "G", "T", etc. Any idea what those actually mean? From what I understand, the database is from FAA. But I'm not 100% sure.
I'm very interested to learn if there are (m)any (major) (commercial) airports that have runways further away from the terminal(s) than Schiphol's Polderbaan. Which airport is "in the lead" in this respect? The northern end of the Polderbaan, the last runway to be constructed, is 7 km (4.3 mi) north of the control tower, causing taxi times of up to 20 minutes to the terminal. [...] Newest runway, opened 2003. Located to reduce the noise impact on the surrounding population; aircraft have a lengthy 15-minute taxi to and from the Terminal. Wikipedia
I'm interested in short, or trick, take-offs - such as from platforms, tall trees, etc. I think that I should have a wind speed and direction measure an understanding of my wing surface area This will let me add to my intuition from regular launches (from sites with known-good launch conditions), and estimate how much velocity I need to add via a run / push. The methodology to count the wind measure seem a bit more grey, right now. I can have a sense of the wind where I am, but it may quickly change beyond my launch site. Since I'm considering how to launch from a stationary