Regulations regarding plane spotting

  • Regulations regarding plane spotting flyingfisch

    I was told that certain plane spotting activities like taking photos of aircraft taking off and landing could be illegal since 9/11? What are the regulations on this, and what should I be aware of before I set my camera up at the end of the runway?

  • Generally absent a specific prohibition you can take a photo of anything you can see with your eyes from public property (like a sidewalk). That includes airports, airplanes, bridges, tunnels, police officers, kittens, and unicorns.
    (For more in-depth information check out Andrew Kantor's excellent article and Bert Krages' excellent one-page flyer on photographers' rights, or check out - they've covered airport photography, though not in any real depth, and I'm sure they have some street photographers well versed in the legal aspects of taking pictures.)

    So what constitutes a "specific prohibition" on photography? Generally a clearly visible sign that says PHOTOGRAPHY PROHIBITED (the old Grumman facility in Bethpage had such signs on all of the fences where there was a decent view of the runway).

    Absent such a clear prohibition you're free to take all the photos you want as long as you're on public property while you're doing it (i.e. "not trespassing on airport property"), but be aware that some law enforcement officials may not see it that way, and you may have to have some uncomfortable interactions with them.
    In my experience most police officers are well versed in the law, though occasionally you'll find one who isn't. You're more likely to have trouble with a "rent-a-cop" security guard though.

    If you want really good photographs (and you're not photographing at a major airport like JFK or O'Hare) you might want to speak to the airport management. At smaller airports someone - either airport personnel or a local pilot - might be able and willing to escort you airside where you can get some really great shots.
    It helps in this situation if you have a body of work you can show (either published photos or art prints). The caveat is that many airports will also ask that you carry some kind of insurance while you're photographing on their property (and at larger airline fields that requirement can be substantial).

  • The ACLU notes that:

    The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) acknowledges that photography is permitted in and around airline security checkpoints as long as you're not interfering with the screening process. The TSA does ask that its security monitors not be photographed, though it is not clear whether they have any legal basis for such a restriction when the monitors are plainly viewable by the traveling public.

    The TSA also warns that local or airport regulations may impose restrictions that the TSA does not. It is difficult to determine if any localities or airport authorities actually have such rules. If you are told you cannot take photographs in an airport you should ask what the legal authority for that rule is.

    Popular among photographers, The Photographer's Right, a summary of legal rights related to photography (prepared by a lawyer), says that:

    There are some exceptions to the general rule. A significant one is that commanders of military installations can prohibit photographs of specific areas when they deem it necessary to protect national security.

    Despite misconceptions to the contrary, the following subjects can almost always be photographed lawfully from public places:

    accident and fire scenes, children, celebrities, bridges and other infrastructure, residential and commercial buildings, industrial facilities and public utilities, transportation facilities (e.g., airports), criminal activities, law enforcement officers

    Some airports are more spotter-friendly than others. You can search online to find discussion forums on people's opinions which ones are better than others. Any airport that is private property (not many major ones, I believe) of course can do whatever they want, but many airports stop photography for a "safety" measure.

    Standard IANAL disclosure.

Related questions and answers
  • plane was fine, and I can't find any Part 61 regulations that are specific to experience in one make/model aside from adding an experimental aircraft as part §61.63(h)(1), which is what I assume the box is really for. Of course I'd rather test in my more-experienced plane, but I'm asking specifically for regulations here if Plan A falls through. Are there any regulations or headaches that I... club's 1980 Piper Archer (PA-28-181). I have well over §61.109's 40 hours in the Warrior alone, and only ~10 hours in the Archer. I have a separate club checkout and CFI solo endorsement for each

  • I was told that certain plane spotting activities like taking photos of aircraft taking off and landing could be illegal since 9/11? What are the regulations on this, and what should I be aware of before I set my camera up at the end of the runway?

  • How safe is IFR in class E? Philippe Leybaert

    at 10,000 feet in VMC on an IFR flight plan while in class E airspace. I'm pretty sure many pilots will be on autopilot without taking too much notice of what's happening outside but according to the regulations the pilot is still responsible for seeing and avoiding other VFR traffic. Are there any accident statistics on this? I have read hundreds of accident reports over the last few years and I

  • Fleet, which is taking part in the search, says he expects the plane's flight recorders to be floating in the water. "In calm seas, if there were a soccer ball [football] or a basketball floating... that radio beacon. We have not yet picked up anything, but that's typically what those black boxes contain." I was under the (potentially incorrect) impression that flight recorders, by nature... Fleet, which is taking part in the search, said he expected the plane's flight recorders to be floating in the water. He said the recorders, also known as "black boxes", are fitted with radio

  • As far as my knowledge goes: There is a 250 kt speed limit under the altitude of 10.000 feet. This screenshot seem to show an aircraft below 10.000 feet and traveling at 285 kts at the time i captured the screenshot. I don't think this aircraft posed any threats to other aviation traffic as there is no other traffic in the airspace. I was just curious. EDIT: Shortly after: I see this aircraft taking off from the same airport. Doing the same thing as the first plane.

  • Are 40 hours of flight really enough to gain experience to fly a small private plane alone anywhere? The rules state so but from experience off you pilots, is it really enough or should be more hours be clocked with another experienced pilot next to you before venturing out? Today I had my first flight on a 152 from Dar es Salaam International Airport, and the area is quite busy. There were bigger aircraft taking off and approaching and many other taxiing. Putting an inexperienced pilot that has barely 40 hours in an environment like this could cause serious problems even though he has

  • , and the certificate, when exercising those privileges. I can't find that wording or anything like it relating to my radio operator's certificate in the CARS, the Radiocommunications Regulations...Is there a Canadian law or regulation which requires me to have my Radiotelephone Operator's Restricted Certificate (Aeronautical) on-board the aircraft with me? This is what I've found so far: Canada requires you to hold the certificate (Radiocommunications regulations, Part V, Section 33): A person may operate radio apparatus in the aeronautical service, maritime service or amateur radio

  • of freight. So, quite impressive. As an European I notice a certain fear with traditional airlines like Air France-KLM, Lufthansa and British Airways of losing the Asian market and a lot... in Dubai and skip other big airport hubs in Asia or Europe. This whole question basically comes down to 'What is the impact of Dubai and the Gulf Carriers on aviation'? More specific... Though the question above is interesting it clearly was way to broad. So lets start with other hubs and routes. What air routes will probably be effected by this (both negatively and positively)? And what measures

  • Taking easyJet as an example, they have a fleet of over 200 A319's and A320's. At a price tag of around \$90m per plane, that equates to about \$18bn. Given that their turnover for 2012/13 was around \$7bn, and their net profit was only \$660m, how exactly do they own so many planes? Are they financed long-term? Are they leased? How are the deals structured for the big airlines when purchasing new planes?

  • Forgive my total lack of aviation knowledge. I just flew out of SFO and was fascinated by the fact that pairs of planes alternated between departing on 28L + 28R (simultaneously) and arriving on 19L/R. My question is this: What amount of micromanagement from ATC exists to keep taking-off planes on schedule and not running into the landing planes, especially in cases where runways cross? How much information does the tower give to the taxiing planes? Thanks!

Data information