What is an FAA Notice? Does it have legal force?

Jeff Street
  • What is an FAA Notice? Does it have legal force? Jeff Street

    The FAA issues Notices and other non-legislative rules (e.g. Advisory Circulars). These documents are distinct from the laws in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. What are the differences between them? Do they have legal force?

  • As SSumner pointed out, the FAA produces all kinds of paper - some of which is "regulatory" and/or have legal force, and some of which isn't. I won't go into all of the specific document categories, but I'll talk about a few that most of us will find interesting.

    • Handbooks and Manuals
      The FAA actually publishes full-length books, if you know where to look!
      The FAA has written books on flying an airplane, flying balloons, risk management, buying & owning an airplane, and a whole bunch of other topics which provide broad information that you can use to familiarize yourself with a topic.

    • Advisory Circulars
      Advisory Circulars (ACs) are the FAA's way of explaining their regulations.
      They're broken down into sections which generally match up with the FARs they're interpreting. Some ACs may rival the lengths of handbooks, but they are much more narrowly focused, generally dealing with a single topic and often much easier to understand than the legislation they're interpreting.

    • Airworthiness Directives
      When an unsafe condition is identified in an aircraft or component which requires action the FAA can issue an Airworthiness Directive (AD), requiring that specific actions be taken.
      Often the required action is compliance with a manufacturer's Service Bulletin (or compliance with a service bulletin is also an acceptable method of compliance with an AD).
      There are also Special Airworthiness Information Bulletins (SAIBs), which are like "Mini-ADs": The FAA is calling operators' and mechanics' attention to something which may not merit an AD. SAIBs are informational - you don't have to comply with them - but it's certainly a good idea to read them and pay attention to the things they're highlighting.

    • Orders
      An "Order" describes procedures used by the FAA. For example, JO 7110.65U describes various aspects of how ATC works. Procedures described in Orders may be modified by Notices.

    • Notices
      A "Notice" is just an agency's way of saying "Yo! Pay attention! Something's happening!"
      Your question seems generally concerned with internal notices which I linked to in the title. These generally modify Orders, like this one.
      The FAA can also issue "Public Notices" about changes that affect airmen and the general public, or pretty much any other topic they'd like. Public Notices are published on faa.gov as well, but the easiest place to find those is through the FAA Safety Team's SPANS system which is searchable and has a much nicer interface than digging through the FAA site by region.


    As for whether the non-legislative documents have legal force the answer is a very well-qualified "maybe". Some certainly have the force of regulation – Airworthiness Directives being the most obvious – and for our purposes I think that's what you're really concerned with, because the law says you have to comply with the regulations.
    Orders and Notices are similarly "regulatory" for the agency: The FAA has to comply with its own orders, so ATC has to be operated the way JO 7110 says it's to be operated.

    For stuff like ACs, Handbooks, etc. we discussed this in chat a while back talking about the answer to FAA Order 8900 and the FSMS - the gist of it is that the non-legislative documents the FAA produces are generally interpretations and guidance, but they are "effectively regulatory" in that if you go against them you need to have an excellent reason for doing so, and be prepared to back it up with appropriate justification and evidence if asked.

    As a classic example, alterations to aircraft are expected to be performed in accordance with manufacturer's maintenance procedures, or "other methods, techniques, or practices acceptable to the Administrator" which are described in AC 43.13 (43.13-2B deals with light, non-pressurized aircraft and is an interesting read).

    A mechanic doesn't have to comply with the guidance in AC 43.13, but if a mechanic were to modify an aircraft without conforming to that guidance they would need to supply supporting documentation as to why their work is acceptable, such as a statement from a Designated Engineering Representative, otherwise the FAA could deem the work "unacceptable" (and from a liability standpoint, the mechanic could wind up in serious trouble should something go wrong with the aircraft as a result of that work).

Related questions and answers
  • Is there a Canadian law or regulation which requires me to have my Radiotelephone Operator's Restricted Certificate (Aeronautical) on-board the aircraft with me? This is what I've found so far: Canada requires you to hold the certificate (Radiocommunications regulations, Part V, Section 33): A person may operate radio apparatus in the aeronautical service, maritime service or amateur radio... uses in its regulations to say that you need to actually have the document with you is at CARS 401.03 (1)(d) (regarding pilot licences): the person can produce the permit, licence or rating

  • Advisory Circular AC 61-136 which outlines the approval and limitations of flight training devices seems to contradict 14 CFR 61.57(c). To what extent can I use an AATD for instrument currency? In addition, to what extent can an AATD be used toward and instrument proficiency check (IPC)? Edit: I have located this document from the FAA Office of Aviation Safety that clarifies that AATDs and BATDs are governed by FAR 61.4(c) and are authorized for specific purposes and can be used in the same manner at a Flight Training Device instead of a Aviation Training Device as long as they have

  • The FAA issues Notices and other non-legislative rules (e.g. Advisory Circulars). These documents are distinct from the laws in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. What are the differences between them? Do they have legal force?

  • In the US, the FFDO programme trains and permits pilots to carry a firearm in the cockpit. Do any other countries have a similar programme?

  • to have the transponder on for TCAS? Specifically, the Wikipedia page on Air Force One has the following quote: Air traffic controllers gave Air Force One an ominous warning that a passenger jet was close to Air Force One and was unresponsive to calls. "As we got over Gainesville, Fla., we got the word from Jacksonville Center. They said, 'Air Force One you have traffic behind you...Air Force One is obviously a big deal. We close terminals and implement other seemingly crazy safeguards against terrorist attacks while the president is en-route to an airport. How does ATC

  • aid in locating a downed or missing airliner? There are a dozen or so brands out there, most using similar technology, like this ACR ARTEX unit: Now, I'm well aware of the FAA and FCC regulations about electronic devices in flight, and that's not what I'm interested in. I also realize that airliners already carry an ELT. If a paranoid passenger brought one on board, would these devices function at all from inside an airliner cabin? Some feed GPS location data to a 406MHz locator beacon, and those would potentially be less useful (as they'd have to be at hand and probably triggered manually

  • will have a series of circles from max distance and one circle from the ping. These intersections will give a series of possible arcs. This process can be repeated (with increasing complexity... information available. For example, from the ping circles separated by one hour, we can get plausible directions the plane may have taken. Why isn't anyone pursuing this line of analysis

  • was in the cockpit while the other one was outside, following standard regulations. DGCA however, got wind of this, and turned out to be not in a very festive mood. Mid-air Holi celebrations aboard eight flights have cost SpiceJet heavily, with the DGCA issuing show cause notice to the airline and suspending two of its pilots. Here's another news link. One of the arguments made by the DGCA was that this was dangerous to flight operations, and could have resulted in disaster had there been any emergency on-board during the event. Also, that this could result in an unruly cabin

  • The Soloy Dual Pac apparently allows two engines to rotate one propeller -- here's a picture of it on an Otter: Is this recognised as a centreline thrust twin engine aircraft, a "standard" twin engine aircraft or just an aircraft with a single engine for FAA certification? What about for pilot licensing?

  • Figure 10-5 of the FAA's Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge shows: I didn't think $L/D_{MAX}$ coincided with $D_{MIN}$. Is this Figure accurate?

Data information