What is a demonstrated crosswind component?

xpda
  • What is a demonstrated crosswind component? xpda

    What is a demonstrated crosswind component? Is it possible to land in a crosswind greater than the demonstrated crosswind component? Is it safe to?

  • A demonstrated crosswind component is highest crosswind (corrected to make it 90°) which has been shown to be possible to safely land by a test pilot. It shall not require exceptional skill by an ordinary pilot, however it does not mean every pilot will be able to do so. It is also NOT a limit (contrary to what some say) - if the pilot does decide to land higher crosswinds, they can do so (but please take caution).

    This number may not necessarily be the highest crosswind component that it's possible to land in -- it just has to be above the minimum capabilities required in the regulations. For example, say an aircraft, flown perfectly (yes, we're dreaming), was capable of handling a 30 knot crosswind component (no gust, ISA conditions), the manufacturer only needs to demonstrate safe landing with a crosswind component of one-fifth of the reference stall speed in the landing configuration. This would be:

    • 10 knots @ 50KIAS VS0
    • 12 knots @ 60KIAS VS0
    • 14 knots @ 70KIAS VS0
    • 15 knots @ 75KIAS VS0

    Reference:

    (a) A 90 degree cross-component of wind velocity, demonstrated to be safe for taxiing, takeoff, and landing must be established and must be not less than 0.2 VS0.

Related questions and answers
  • What is a demonstrated crosswind component? Is it possible to land in a crosswind greater than the demonstrated crosswind component? Is it safe to?

  • I was once (like ten years ago) on a transpacific flight with Northwest from KIX/RJBB to KDTW on a Boeing 747 and our flight as delayed at the gate for about an hour because of some issue with a "floating horizon". Is that a malfunction with the attitude indicator? What exactly went wrong? It sounded like they fixed it by swapping out a component, maybe the instrument itself?

  • Is it just my imagination, or is it a fact that many large airliners actually touch down "crabbed" on difficult crosswind landings? Here's what I mean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE (watch at 01:10) Or this: Is the main landing gear specifically designed to allow this? Is it recommended or discouraged by the manufacturer?

  • I used to work for a company making maintenance software for the shipping industry. Each component, from a cylinder in an engine to the furnace has to be inspected after (e.g.) 10,000 running hours, or every 2 years, etc. My question is: Are task cards like the one below still used in aviation, or is there a more up-to-date way of working nowadays? (The PDF I got this from is 10,000 pages long) What must airlines do to ensure their planes are maintained according to schedule?

  • A popular airport near me (KMYF) has two parallel runways, 28/10 R/L and a crosswind runway, 5/23. Almost always, 28R/L is in use. I'm sure they knew that there was generally a sea breeze in the area, and the wind typically will be right down the runway or within 10-20 degrees of centerline. I'm sure they do prevailing wind study for the area, and my questions are about the study: what are there some specifications for the study? Does the study vary in length depending on location? Is there a standard study that they use, and do they test things like average temperature during the study

  • Ok, so this may be more of an english lanugage question, and I can confirm from context that when the fuel shutoff valve is ON fuel does indeed flow to the engine, but wouldn't that just make more sense to call that valve the fuel valve? If the component that shuts fuel off is on, operational, in use, functioning, etc., shouln't fuel be shut off, as the name implies? I realize this could be seen as a quibble, but confusion causes accidents and IMO this is wildly confusing. EDIT Looking at the Cessna 152 checklist today I noticed this interesting quirk. On the regular checklist side (pre

  • This question is about light, tricycle, single engine aircraft. I have made it a habit to raise the flaps right after touchdown (when the nosewheel is on the ground). My instructor used to do that every time during initial training so I took over the habit. It makes sense to do this for the following reasons: better braking performance because lift is reduced while rolling out less crosswind... on a C182 that I wanted to rent in Florida and when I raised the flaps right after touchdown the instructor shouted "what the < beep > are you doing? You should never raise the flaps until you've

  • Suppose the max crosswind rated for my C-182 is 15kts, but the wind is directly across and gusting to 20kts. Is it legal for me to go? I've heard plenty hangar flying stories of many an operation that exceeds the design specifications of certain planes that end successfully.

  • Is there a particular reason for which thrust vectoring is not used in airliners as with military aircraft besides weight and complexity factors? I understand that on military aircraft maneuverability is a core component but, by implementing this technique also on commercial airliners, wouldn't there be any benefit? For example one thing that comes into my mind would be reduction of stress on the tail of an aircraft at high speed/high altitude turns, thus reducing maybe maintenance. Another option would be increased safety, whereas if maneuverability would be compromised by loss of the tail

  • Inspired by this question. My knowledge concerning helicopters is quite limited: what is auto-rotation? are there other "rotations" possible? in what do they differ?

Data information