Lost plane over ocean - bulk processing of satellite data

CJBS
  • Lost plane over ocean - bulk processing of satellite data CJBS

    The case of the lost Malaysian Airlines plane is tragic for all those involved.

    In the case of such a plane lost over the ocean, hypothetically (and described very simplistically), it would seem that the fastest way to search for wreckage would be to define an area to be searched, wait for the latest satellite images for that area at high-resolution to be available (given appropriate positioning and programming of the satellites), then search the captured imagery for deviations from ocean blue.

    Presumably this could be done reasonably quickly by a computer, assuming that satellite imagery is taken after a suspected crash, and exceptions (e.g. spots of white amongst the blue) are able to be verified by a human.

    Does such a system exist? Are imaging satellites able to be configured to take such imagery on demand over a large area? And do such batch-image processing systems exist for this purpose?

  • Update: Satellites were eventually used in the search for MA370, see this article.


    This question might be better answered by the folks at space exploration but here's a shot:

    • Oil slicks are not uncommon at sea, so finding one from the aircraft is not too easy.

    • It's an incredibly large area pulling a lot of processing power. You're going to need pretty good resolution imagery over several square kilometers and then run image recognition on it. Look at this image which has a scale of 25 miles which is still a fraction of what you would need to get an idea:

    sat

    • The fragments you're looking for are very small in regards to waves. I suspect depending on where you are there's a large amount of noise from other rubbish which is hard to filter out, such as a white plastic sheet to a door. You might even go confusing big aircraft parts to other white boats. Yes, you can continue the search but it takes time to go through all of these and dismiss them.

    • A lot of volunteers searched for Steve Fossett when he went missing, and there was some attempts to locate him by satellite imagery from google maps, which was not successful.

    • Aircraft, while not fast, can be over the side within a few hours, while I think you have to wait until the satellites have caught all the imagery you would like.

    While I think it could be done as you say, you would need to develop software and I don't think the market for it exists, but that's just my guess. Reading up it appears that satellites are used against drug cartels along the USA-Mexico border and against illegal immigrants elsewhere in the world.

  • Massive area, large search interval, no complete coverage of the entire area, especially no permanent coverage of the entire area, weather, limited computer power.
    All those factors, each on their own, would make the problem massive. Taken together they make it insurmountable.
    We're talking an area of several million square kilometers that needs to be searched, at a resolution of a few square meters, over an interval of several hours.

    Not only is there no 24/7 photographic coverage at that resolution available of any spot on the planet, it certainly won't exist of a stretch of open ocean in a backwater of geopolitical interest (it MIGHT exist just around the time of a drone strike on a Taliban compound for example, over an area of a few hundred meter around that compound, for maybe 10 minutes prior to 10 minutes past, but that data would be highly classified for obvious reasons and utterly useless unless an airliner crashed right on top of that compound during that small window).

    Manfred hints that satellite coverage is used against drugs and human trafficking and it may be. But it can't detect individual human beings. It CAN potentially detect patterns, like finding paths through brushland that from the ground can't be easily seen but from the air show up. And in case of anti-trafficking use, it mainly is used to surveil known or suspected points of departure, say an airfield in Colombia known to be used by drugs smugglers, and alert law enforcement agencies of a possible inbound aircraft which can then be tracked using other means (like AWACS) and intercepted. Same with boats. But it's not real time, it's photos taken at several hour intervals of known "points of interest".

    We simply lack the resolution to see something the size of a human being (or a floating piece of aircraft debris like a toilet seat or life jacket) from orbit.

    Oil slicks, which tend to spread out a lot, can be observed and investigators sent to the area. This is used in coastal regions to find and fine ships that illegally dump oil from their balast tanks. But again, there's no permanent coverage and certainly not over open ocean. Maybe some country with the capability can redirect one of its satellites after the suspected crash, and hopefully when it gets there it's not too late (dispersal is rapid) AND the weather is clear AND there's daylight AND everything else falls into place.

    No, the best hope is narrowing down the area based on last radio or radar reporting position, and do an area search from there. And if you get real lucky you get a responder in the FDR or CVR to give you a beep, or an emergency beacon in a life raft that got shook loose and turned itself. Other than that, fingers crossed that someone with a pair of binoculars spots something floating out there before it's all sunk to the bottom.

  • Digital Globe, a satellite imaging company (who provide a lot of the data Google uses), has done this for the MH370 flight using a platform called Tomnod, which is currently directing all users straight to the search page. The images they're showing now were taken on 3/9, so apparently they are able to re-task their satellites fairly quickly.

    More info on how to use this is available at How To Use Tomnod To Find MH370.

    Something similar was done using Amazon Mechanical Turk during the search for Jim Gray.

Tags
Related questions and answers
  • The case of the lost Malaysian Airlines plane is tragic for all those involved. In the case of such a plane lost over the ocean, hypothetically (and described very simplistically), it would seem that the fastest way to search for wreckage would be to define an area to be searched, wait for the latest satellite images for that area at high-resolution to be available (given appropriate positioning and programming of the satellites), then search the captured imagery for deviations from ocean blue. Presumably this could be done reasonably quickly by a computer, assuming that satellite imagery

  • : A Malaysian military satellite gave the last geographic fix of ML370 at 2:15AM. A circle can be drawn with this point as the center and distance traveled at maximum speed as diameter, confining the plane's... that the aircraft went that way. In reality, this would be more complicated. For example, the plane most probably did not go along a straight path at max speed. However, useful inferences can be made by adding other...I had posted the question below on a New York Times article, but did not get any useful replies. The series of six successful Inmarsat pings known to exist, MAY carry enough information to say

  • Several such devices can be placed anywhere in the aircraft and can deploy when they float up to the surface and are exposed to sunlight. It would be much easier to find underwater crash sites. I don't think it's too expensive to make. Certainly cheaper than searching with ships and other planes for days (as in the case with MH370 and the Airbus that crashed into the Atlantic ocean).

  • Can someone explain why the aircraft would fly in an arc using the satellite as a reference point? Have I missed something?

  • Fleet, which is taking part in the search, says he expects the plane's flight recorders to be floating in the water. "In calm seas, if there were a soccer ball [football] or a basketball floating... 447, which crashed in the Atlantic), where the recorders were found some time later on the ocean floor. Additionally, it seems reasonable to me that one would want to have the recorders not float so that they would come to rest near the other debris on the ocean floor since the recorders are equipped with underwater locator beacons which would aid in locating not only the recorders themselves

  • What is the best way to keep logbook entries backed up? Should I photocopy or scanned image in computer suffice? Can an Excel spreadsheet or other software/apps be used? In case a logbook is lost or (unfortunately) destroyed, should all entries from the backup be rewritten in a new logbook? Also, when one has 100s or 1000s of hours, spreading over several logbooks, how much importance the older logbooks will have? Would someone go over every page to make sure that this individual actually have 1375.2 hours (as an example)? Thanks.

  • The airlines are always trying to jam more passengers into each plane. I'm smaller than today's average, and I'm still often uncomfortable in a standard Economy seat. It occurred to me that in the current design, there's a great deal of space wasted over the passengers' heads. And that many of us passengers already do our best to sleep through flights. Hence my question: Is there any reason an airline couldn't introduce a cabin in which some or all passengers travel in a reclining, rather than sitting, position? Seems to me that it would be more comfortable (except for claustrophobes

  • On two of my trips (same airline, same kind of plane 777), I noticed that the airplane took very different routes (from New York to UAE). 1st Trip in 2012 (blue): Duration 11h 30m 2nd Trip in 2013 (green): Duration 13h 00m I know that the blue line is the shorter distance, and probably also because of jet streams, it took lesser time. But why a plane would take this green route, even not considering jet streams? Since I am not an important person, I could not ask the captain of the plane this question at the end of journey. P.S.: I observed the flight paths on the entertainment system

  • be able to notice the two blips on the screen unless they were literally under or beside each other, or would it still appear as one dot on secondary radar if say they were 200 meters behind and below? ...I just finished reading an interesting post where the author suggests that the missing Malaysian Airlines flight 370 could have 'hidden' under the cover of Singapore Airlines flight 68 to fly to a covert airstrip. I've read multiple thrillers where submarines have hidden behind the acoustic signal of large cargo vessels to mask their sound over sonar arrays, and this (at least in the book

  • I have not even an idea about how I would search for that on Google, that is why I'm trying my chance here. As electrical engineer I have no clue about fluid mechanics. We all now that when water is pumped very fast into firefighters tube, it gets very rigid and tends to be straight. What is this effect called, I'm interested in doing some research about the forces applied by such a tube from its initial folded position to the final position. Thanks

Data information