In this question, the answer notes that some ADS-B systems are connected to Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), and says they are less accurate than GPS. What exactly is an INS?
A couple sub questions:
Inertial Navigation Systems, unlike other navigation systems, do not depend on external (radio) measurements. Instead an INS keeps track of its position by accurately measuring acceleration (accelerometers) and rotation (gyroscopes). It therefore works in remote areas where there are no ground based navaids available.
Initially, the INS gets its position from pilot input at the gate, or in more recent systems from GPS, sometimes even during flight. By measuring all the accelerations and rotations and integrating them into speed and direction the position is tracked. In doing this, the INS has to correct for the rotation of the earth and the related Coriolis force.
Due to small inaccuracies in the measurements the velocity error and, with that, the position errors grow over time.
Wikipedia has quite a detailed article about the history and working of the INS.
While raw INS position has mainly been replaced by GPS measurements on oceanic flights, the system is not being phased out. GPS is a sensitive systems and by crosschecking it with INS errors can be detected in both systems. It is often used as a backup to GPS.
Integrated GPS / INS systems provide better systems integrity and allow the navigation system to coast through short GPS outages with high accuracies. In addition to that, the (laser) gyroscopes of the INS are often used to provide data to the digital artificial horizon displays in the cockpit and to the auto flight systems. In this case the term Inertial Reference Unit (IRU) is used, which acts as a basis for the INS.
Inertial Navigation System it uses a planes motion as detected by on-board accelerometers and gyroscopes to find where it is going using no external reference points.
A plane has a certain known heading and speed, when the planes makes a turn, hits a headwind,... accelerometers and gyroscopes will detect the change in motion and orientation and update accordingly. This means that initial accuracy depends on the how accurate the initial position speed and heading are when INS is initialized. The accelerometers and gyroscopes have limited granularity/accuracy and extrapolating your position from relative angle changes will compound an earlier error immensely.
For example if the System is off by 1 degree on a turn then after 500 miles it will be off by (500*crd(1°)=500*2*sin(0.5°)=) 8.7 miles assuming all other information is correct. (this example is not fully correct as the gyros measure rate of turn rather than actual angle turned)
INS is used primarily as a supplemental source of navigation data and as a fall back when other sources are unavailable.
In this question, the answer notes that some ADS-B systems are connected to Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), and says they are less accurate than GPS. What exactly is an INS? A couple sub questions: Why is it less accurate? The other post mentions they tend to develop biases as they get older, why is that? Are they being phased out? Or are they used as backup?
Generally speaking, What programming language is used in aviation for (ATC Radio, Radar, ILS, Auto-pilot and on-board avionics)? Is there a standard enforced by ICAO? Does every plane manufacturer use the programming language they like as long as it's reliable and it goes through testing? I remember watching a documentary on YouTube last year about aviation and it said something about the EU, after WWII, started making standards for aviation systems inside Europe. I will link the video if I can find it
Based on the reading I've been doing of FAA's Next Generation Air Traffic Control (NextGen) plans, I've been wondering if and how radar systems will continue to be used for ATC as NextGen rolls out? Questions include: Is it correct to assert that radar coverage will effectively become a less precise, backup only, data feed? I am suggesting this because my understanding (which could easily be incorrect) is that ADS-B will mandated for most (everyone?) and so aircraft will be actively reporting their precise position without the need for a radar track. Will existing radar coverage eventually
Chemtrail conspiracy theorists believe that there are certain additives being put into jet fuel to spew out [nano-]particles that rain down on us, for means that are being kept secret. The hypothesiz...
Inspired by this question. My knowledge concerning helicopters is quite limited: what is auto-rotation? are there other "rotations" possible? in what do they differ?
In a full motion Level C or D simulator like those used by the airlines and for jet type ratings: How should a pilot log the simulator time in their logbook? I.e. Can you log: Total Time Instru...
An autobrake is a type of automatic wheel-based hydraulic brake system for advanced airplanes. The autobrake is normally enabled during takeoff and landing procedures, when the aircraft's longitudinal deceleration system can be handled by the automated systems of the aircraft itself in order to keep the pilot free to perform other tasks - Wikipedia How does the aircraft "know" when is time to activate the autobrake systems on a rejected takeoff and landing? Does it apply full brake to all the aircraft's wheels? Is it really used by commercial jets?
In the olden days there used to be a navigation officer in commercial airlines who had the tasks of navigation and radio communication. But, in modern commercial airliners there is no navigation officer. Do the pilot(s) take the additional responsibility of radio communication and navigation? Or is the navigation part now done by onboard computers and systems? If the electronic navigation system fails, are there any backup plans? Are physical maps and a compass then used to determine the direction and position?
Following acceleration paramters are transmitted from Inertial Reference System (IRS) to Flight Control System (FCS) Flight Path Acceleration Along Track Acceleration Cross Track Acceleration Vertical Acceleration Unbiased Normal Acceleration Along Heading Acceleration Cross Heading Acceleration I only know acceleration based on the aircraft axis i.e lateral, longitudinal & Normal acceleration but what these acceleration paramters signifies?
Airplanes with propellers were invented a long time ago. After that, jet engines came into existence. My question is: why do we still have propeller engines? The reasons I can think of are: They are cheaper; They cannot achieve very high speed; They are not very noisy (though not always). Besides these, are there any other reasons general aviation airplanes built nowadays don't have jet engines?