# How does aileron reversal work?

igen5
• How does aileron reversal work? igen5

I want to know how aileron reversal takes place when control reversal velocity is higher than divergence speed and operating speed is in between them (for conventional wing)

• Control reversal speed is way lower than divergence speed. It may actually lower than operating speed for some aircraft, which is why they have inboard ailerons/flapperons and/or use spoilers (that don't suffer control reversal) for roll control at high speeds.

Control reversal (at high speed; there is also control reversal at stall, which is different) occurs because the force generated by ailerons twists the wing sufficiently so that the aileron starts to act more like trim tab. For that the wing has to flex, but it does not have to flutter at all.

Spoilers act closer to the wing mid-chord, so they don't twist it much and thus don't suffer reversal. In fact they twist the wing a bit, because pre-stall lift acts more forward than post-stall lift, but this twists the wing forward and thus further reduces the lift, so still no control reversal.

• As I understand it, aileron reversal can occur in two regimes of flight, high speed and near stall.

Near stall, the wing is very near it's critical angle of attack. When the pilot inputs let's say a left turn, the right aileron will deflect downward. This downward deflection increases the AOA of the outboard portion of the right wing such that the lift generated by that outboard portion is lower (drag higher as well) than the lift generated on the opposite wing.

You can kind-of visualize this by thinking of a wing operating on the backside of the lift curve.

Aileron reversal at high speed, (again, as I understand it) can occur when the wing isn't stiff enough tortionally to prevent twisting about the aircraft's lateral axis when a control input is made. Some old warplanes had this characteristic at high speeds.

For example, the pilot makes a control input to the left. The right aileron deflects downward, and instead of raising the overall AOA of the wing, it lowers it because the aileron acts like a trim tab, twisting the wing's leading edge downward.

Your question is asking: If the control reversal velocity is calculated to be higher than the divergence velocity, (When the wing breaks apart), how then can control reversal take place in flight?

The answer would be when it occurs near a stall.

Tags
• I want to know how aileron reversal takes place when control reversal velocity is higher than divergence speed and operating speed is in between them (for conventional wing)

• In aeroelasticity, there are three main phenomena that one should take care of: divergence, aileron reversal and flutter. Each of them has an associated speed at which the phenomenon might start to occur. During wind-tunnel tests it is possible to increase the flutter speed to have access to the divergence speed first by using some small masses smartly placed on the wing. This is due to the fact that usually flutter speed is smaller than divergence speed. Is it always the case for aircraft (without additional masses on the wing)? If not do you have any example? If yes do you have

• if I fly an approach at a speed that falls into a different category? For instance, a jet may land at significantly less than this speed if very light, or more than this speed if landing with less...FAR 91.3 says: Aircraft approach category means a grouping of aircraft based on a speed of VREF, if specified, or if VREF is not specified, 1.3 Vso at the maximum certificated landing weight...— (1) Category A: Speed less than 91 knots. (2) Category B: Speed 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots. (3) Category C: Speed 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots. (4

• I thought the shape of the wing gave an airplane upward lift. How can it fly if it's upside down?

• lift with unchanged attitude, such as a symmetric aileron movement, or an additional flaps extension? And then after the plane is airborne it is rotated to climbing attitude? The descriptions I can easily Google up point towards 1. However, while that makes perfect sense for tricycle gear I don't see how that would work with taildraggers. Pushing down on the tail would just increase...If I understand correctly, when a plane transitions from takeoff roll to being airborne, it is not something that happens "by itself" when the airspeed is high enough, but is caused by deliberate

• I had posted the question below on a New York Times article, but did not get any useful replies. The series of six successful Inmarsat pings known to exist, MAY carry enough information to say...: A Malaysian military satellite gave the last geographic fix of ML370 at 2:15AM. A circle can be drawn with this point as the center and distance traveled at maximum speed as diameter, confining the plane's... that the aircraft went that way. In reality, this would be more complicated. For example, the plane most probably did not go along a straight path at max speed. However, useful inferences can be made by adding other

• I've read a lot of NTSB crash reports regarding small, GA aircraft (just trying to figure out what went wrong and what to avoid.) There seem to be a lot of reports that talk about "low altitude high speed stalls" happening on approach. What is a high speed stall, and how is it created? What is the best way to avoid one? As they seem to cause a lot of GA accidents...

• Anecdotally I have heard of various things that I can do to make steel brakes last longer before they have to be replaced, and they make sense but how much does it really help? Things that I have heard: Land at the minimum recommend speed Use maximum reverse thrust (if you have it) Delay braking after landing (if on a sufficiently long runway) to allow slowing before brake application Various taxi techniques (taxi on one engine, don't ride the brakes, but instead build up speed and then brake to slow down. Rinse and repeat.) Are there any studies that have been done to show how much

• I'm interested in short, or trick, take-offs - such as from platforms, tall trees, etc. I think that I should have a wind speed and direction measure an understanding of my wing surface area This will let me add to my intuition from regular launches (from sites with known-good launch conditions), and estimate how much velocity I need to add via a run / push. The methodology to count the wind measure seem a bit more grey, right now. I can have a sense of the wind where I am, but it may quickly change beyond my launch site. Since I'm considering how to launch from a stationary

• the take-off speed, a small gust of wind was all that he needed to begin flying again. The additional lift was enough to raise him 10 feet from the runway, and at that point he ran out of gust... on to state how much flap should be used in what conditions, and then he finishes with this: Let us then raise the flaps in gusty or crosswinds as soon as the wheels touch down. To wait until it is time to taxi doesn't help slow the plane very much, and flaps do constitute a hazard in gusts. Besides, it is surprising how much a small pebble costs when it goes through a flap. Is he right

Data information