Is it possible for the sensors which determine when an aircraft has landed in water to become damaged?

answers
  • Is it possible for the sensors which determine when an aircraft has landed in water to become damaged? answers

    A plane has sensors that should transmit data back somewhere when it hits water correct? Is it possible that these can be turned off/damaged?

  • Yes, the component in question is called the Underwater Locator Beacon.

    They are not foolproof. To disable them manually you need physical access to the black boxes, which are located in the tail section of the plane.

  • A plane has sensors that should transmit data back somewhere when it hits water correct?

    This isn't really correct.

    CVR/FDR/ULB

    The Cockpit Voice recorder (CVR) and Flight Data Recorder (FDR) don't transmit data. They do have attached to each of them an Underwater Locator Beacon (ULB) but this doesn't transmit data either. When submerged, it sends out a sonar ping every 50 seconds for up to 30 days. This sonar signal can be detected by an immersed sonar sensor in the near vicinity (maybe a couple of miles), not across thousands of miles of open ocean.

    EPIRB/ELT

    Ships/boats typically carry an Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) designed to start transmitting a location signal to satellites when the ship or boat capsizes or sinks.

    The aircraft equivalent is the Emergency Locator Beacon (ELT) but, in the USA, from what I've read, this is only mandated for small private aircraft.

    Commercial planes that fly scheduled routes are not required to have an ELT (I imagine the regulators thought that ATC communication, transponders and ACARS would together provide adequate location data)

    787s do have ELTs fitted, somewhat notoriously. I've seen nothing to suggest that 10-year-old 777s do.


    Is it possible that these can be turned off/damaged?

    ULBs cannot be turned off in flight - because they are not on. Since the CVR and FDR are at the rear of airliners the ULB is not accessible from the cockpit and probably cannot be easily disabled. A ULB would have to be disassembled (see 02:55 onwards).

    The ELT, if carried, is typically fixed to the top of the aircraft and designed to break away if a plane sinks. I imagine this makes it difficult for the crew to access it and disable it in flight.

    enter image description here
    yes, ELTs can be damaged.

Related questions and answers
  • A plane has sensors that should transmit data back somewhere when it hits water correct? Is it possible that these can be turned off/damaged?

  • Provided an aircraft with a fly-by-wire system, there are basically two possible choices when it comes deciding how to let the pilots interface with it: rate control / attitude hold: a deflection... translate to a deflection of the surfaces, mimicking the "old" mechanical control setup. It is my understanding that this is the design choice of Boeing in its new aircrafts. I do not wish to discuss how Airbus and Boeing made their design decisions, but rather see if there has been performed a study on what interface is preferred by pilots, eventually differentiating among private/commercial pilots

  • When I took delivery of a new Cessna 182T last year, I did a test flight for certification purposes. During the test flight we had to perform a power off stall but that didn't go as planned as it was simply impossible to stall. What happened is this: when the airspeed dropped well below the power off stall speed we simply started to sink slowly with a nose-high attitude at about 35 KIAS... this to happen? (My guess is it is CG related) And most importantly: If I would have continued this "mushing" flight, would it be possible to have entered a flat spin or a simple "drop out of the sky

  • We know that most of the plane accidents and deaths result from the explosion of fuel tanks in the planes, like when two planes collide, or when the plane falls on the ground. With the advent of technology, i wonder whether it is possible to prevent the fuel explosion. Can this be done by evaporating the fuel in the planes just before the collision? Or use a solid architecture encapsulating the fuel tanks in the planes, such that the fuel is not set to fire? What research has been done in this field and if so what were the findings?

  • Without getting into the mess of redesigning existing Flight Data Recorders, I have a simple proposal that I think would help in deep water crashes. I propose that several floating cushion sets be distributed around the plane (tail section, along fuselage, etc.). These FDR floaties would be about the size of a seat cushion, but they'd be wrapped in a water soluble cover. When a plane crashes into the water, if the plane breaks up, then several of the cushions would float to the surface. When the cover dissolves, several folded arms open up making it much bigger exposing a orange-nylon

  • When designing an aircraft, there has to be a decision as to the aspect ratio of a wing. It's been said that having a higher aspect wing will reduce drag for the same wing area, however most of the time wings are shorter than they can be. So my question is, what exactly dictates the aspect ratio of a wing, and why don't they make them as long as possible?

  • Here is a $C_L$ / $AoA$ curve that I took from Wikipedia. The better textbooks say that a stall is that condition in which a further increase in angle of attack will result in a reduction of lift. The point at which that transition happens is known as the critical angle of attack. Theoretically, sustained flight is possible at angles beyond the critical angle of attack - take a look... curve without an angle of attack indicator? Or to ask the question another way, Is there a practical way to tell when an airplane has exceeded the critical angle of attack without an AoA meter?

  • of the materials needed to protect their contents in the event of a crash, are quite dense and unable to float in water. I base this impression on news reporting of other airliner crashes (such as Air France..., the writer of the article, or I (or some combination thereof) misunderstand something about flight recorders and their behavior in water. My questions are these: Do flight recorders float on water... Fleet, which is taking part in the search, says he expects the plane's flight recorders to be floating in the water. "In calm seas, if there were a soccer ball [football] or a basketball floating

  • Inspired by this question. My knowledge concerning helicopters is quite limited: what is auto-rotation? are there other "rotations" possible? in what do they differ?

  • Many commercial airliners have car-like window-wipers. I would presume this is for taxiing only, as the wind would surely keep the windows free from water when airborne, or do they turn them on in flight? Also, don't these wipers cause a lot of drag, and wouldn't it be more economical to have some kind of air-jet blowing from nozzles to keep the windshield clear?

Data information