What are the operational differences between an airplane equipped with a constant speed propeller and one with a fixed pitch propeller?

  • What are the operational differences between an airplane equipped with a constant speed propeller and one with a fixed pitch propeller? Lnafziger

    What makes a constant speed prop different from a fixed pitch prop, and what are the operational differences between airplanes with the two?

  • A constant speed propeller runs at a specific rpm by changing the blade pitch. When the blades are at a lower pitch (i.e., flatter angle), there is less air resistance, so the propeller puts less drag on the engine and runs faster. Additional pitch causes more drag and slower RPM. A governor (or something similar) will adjust the blade pitch to keep the propeller running at a particular rpm, even when more or less power is produced by the engine.

    A constant speed prop is typically found on more powerful engines. Constant speed props are more efficient, but are more complex and heavier than fixed pitch props.

    Some planes have a prop speed control for the pilot to adjust the propeller rpm, and some, such has the Cirrus SR22 and Pilatus PC12 have a single prop speed for flight.

    The operation of a variable pitch prop depends on the plane. For example, in a Cirrus SR22 you don't even have a propeller pitch control. You operate it just like a fixed pitch prop. With a Pilatus PC12, the only prop pitch adjustments are when you feather the prop on engine shutdown or reverse the prop pitch for landing or ground operations. In a Beech Bonanza A36, you adjust the prop pitch for max RPM (minimum pitch) on takeoff, then add pitch for cruise flight, and max RPM for landing (in case of go-around).

  • See here for my own explanation of the workings of various constant-speed propeller systems.

    The main operational difference is in power management. With a fixed pitch propeller, if you want more power for climb or speed, you add throttle. When you pitch up, the the RPM will slow due to less air moving through the propeller: suddenly instead of inertia helping you along, your engine is having to work to keep you going. When you pitch down, the RPM will increase due to more air moving through the prop. In this case you have to reduce throttle or you will overspeed the engine.

    With a constant speed propeller, engine RPM is largely unaffected by the attitude and airspeed of the aircraft. The problem is that if you're flying along at cruise speed with your propeller in cruise configuration and decide to pitch up to climb, your propeller is not able to impart the full energy of the engine into the air. Your climb performance will be diminished or non-existant until you reset the prop to a low pitch. So the main thing to consider is that with a CS prop, maximum power is not always instantly available.

    You can also damage the engine easier with a CS prop, in my opinion. With a fixed pitch prop if you go into a dive, your RPM will increase giving you visual and auditory clues that it's happening. With a CS prop, you can enter into a dive and possibly go all the way to Vne without the engine noticing a thing. The problem arises when you're going fast and decide you want to push the prop lever forward: your engine suddenly jumps hundreds or thousands of RPMs in an instant. This is extremely bad for it and that's why many aircraft manuals say not to increase to max RPM above a certain airspeed.

    Finally, although it is more than made up for in efficiency, engine management is just more complicated with a CS prop. Say you're wanting to maintain a stabilized approach at 100kts. You need to find some combination of throttle and prop settings that gives you enough power to maintain a stable sinkrate, and either has enough drag to slow you down to 100kts, or has minimal drag, allowing you to keep your speed up.

Related questions and answers
  • thought, or would such a prop-winglet-ring (I'm sure there's a real name for it, anyone know what I'm talking about?) cause other disruptions of the airflow? Or perhaps there are other reasons, like it would simply be too hard to solve for constant-speed props? ... reduce - or even completely remove - the induced drag around the tips of the fan blades? Would it be possible to have a similar setup for a standard prop, it doesn't even have to be stationary, it could

  • I've seen on numerous different constant-speed propeller aircraft and different pilots using different RPMs during the cruise phase on a propeller aircraft. What dictates the RPM used during normal cruise operations, and why is that the case? Often there are multiple possible throttle/RPM combinations that deliver the same power, so where would you pick one or the other?

  • What does one need to do when a turboprop engine gets over-torqued? I haven't over-torqued an engine before, but it seems it could happen inadvertently, say while doing a go-around. My questions are: Why is important not to over-torque an engine? What happens if you do over-torque an engine?

  • I read that a three blade can improve climb performance and decrease noise. How does that work?

  • I was flying on Porter Airlines and they had an info card about how similar the Bombardier (I still say DeHavallind) Dash 8 Q400s are to the Bombardier CSeries they have ordered are. There was a cool overlay photo to show relative sizes and shapes: Looking at that image, it got me wondering about the straight vs angled wing. Straight vs angled tails, etc. I get that a jet is faster than a turbo prop. Cseries cruise speeds are: Mach 0.78 (828 km/h, 447 kn, 514 mph) Dash8 Q400 cruise speeds are: 414 mph (667 km/h) 360 knots Those are pretty close and yet that is a pretty radical

  • What makes a constant speed prop different from a fixed pitch prop, and what are the operational differences between airplanes with the two?

  • The Soloy Dual Pac apparently allows two engines to rotate one propeller -- here's a picture of it on an Otter: Is this recognised as a centreline thrust twin engine aircraft, a "standard" twin engine aircraft or just an aircraft with a single engine for FAA certification? What about for pilot licensing?

  • Inspired by a discussion in chat. Most GA piston singles are powered by either Lycoming or Continental engines. The engine designs used by both manufacturers are broadly similar (4-cycle, horizontally-opposed, gasoline-powered, air-cooled), and they're both generally available with either carburetors or fuel injection, but I know they're not "identical products". What are some of the differences between the designs used by the two manufacturers, and what practical implications do those choices have for pilots?

  • — (1) Category A: Speed less than 91 knots. (2) Category B: Speed 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots. (3) Category C: Speed 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots. (4) Category D: Speed 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots. (5) Category E: Speed 166 knots or more. So an aircraft category never changes because it is always Vref at max landing weight. What...FAR 91.3 says: Aircraft approach category means a grouping of aircraft based on a speed of VREF, if specified, or if VREF is not specified, 1.3 Vso at the maximum certificated landing weight

  • Oxygen masks vs cannulas Qantas 94 Heavy

    There are two main types of supplementary oxygen devices in light aircraft: Cannula: Oxygen mask: What are the major differences between these two devices? Is one more suitable for specific siutations than another, or is it just a matter of personal preference?

Data information