Takeoff and Landing in Zero Visibility

  • Takeoff and Landing in Zero Visibility xpda

    Is it legal for planes to takeoff and land in zero visibility? Is it safe?

  • In the US, for general aviation flights, operating under Part 91 of the FARs, it is legal to take off with zero visibility (see page 2-2 of the IPH, PDF). In my opinion, it is not safe. If an emergency were to take place, you would be unable to return and land; under Part 91, it is not legal to land unless conditions are equal to or better than a runway's published approach minimums.

    Unless you've got a great alternate nearby, conditions are improving rapidly, or you've got an extra engine or two, you probably shouldn't take off in conditions you couldn't land in.

Related questions and answers
  • Is it legal for planes to takeoff and land in zero visibility? Is it safe?

  • A previous question pondered the legality and safety of low visibility Part 91 takeoffs. I am wondering about the requirements for low visibility takeoff for commercial airline operators (e.g. Part-121 scheduled operations). I know of authorizations for operators down to 600 RVR (though I believe I recall 300 RVR for one carrier out of DEN), and various requirements for other increments below standard takeoff minima. My question is: Which RVR are authorized and what ground equipment requirements need to be met to use them? What authorizes (regulation? op spec?) these reduced visibility

  • I'm a frequent subscriber of airport messaging services where you get notified of check-in queue times, delays in takeoff, ETA + 10 minutes, landed timestamp, baggage claim time and these kinds of information, but not life-dependent messages. However, if something bad happens I assume I won't get a "Flight X crashed and burned" message on my cell, but most likely a "Contact the airline at 555-1212 for more information" or something similar. What's the standard operating procedure in these cases?

  • I noticed on SkyVector that, for example, the Resolute Bay VOR (YRB) and Baker Lake VOR (YBK) seem to be oriented in such a way that the 360 radial is pointing in the direction of true north (and I don't think the variation is anywhere near zero there). I know VORs are supposed to be oriented according to magnetic north, but is it common practice close to the magnetic poles to have them point true instead? If so, is there any way to tell if a particular VOR is doing just that, except looking at the chart and noticing that the small arrow is pointing north rather than off to one side?

  • In smaller planes, pilots has apparently great visibility in front, on the sides and a good portion of the rear of the plane. But as the plane's size is increased, the visibility is also reduced. One obvious factor is height of the cockpit from ground, but it appears (from pictures) that pilots of bigger Boeing/Airbus planes have too many blind spots. However, I did notice that some bigger planes have a camera behind the nose gear to ease in taxiing etc. So the question is that how do pilots compensate for this lesser visibility? Do they always need external help (e.g. ground crew

  • As a private pilot I have zero knowledge about how big jets are being flown so I was a little surprised to see that smaller Airbuses (A32x) only use spoilers for roll control on final approach. During the initial phase of the approach ailerons are being used but at a certain point they stay put in the neutral position and roll is controlled by the spoilers. When I mentioned this to the pilot when exiting the aircraft he was a little annoyed by the question and he said I must have seen it wrong. I've seen this numerous times since then so I'm pretty sure I wasn't mistaken. Is this actually

  • Is there a legal definition of a "cycle" on a jet engine? We must log the cycles, and some maintenance is determined by cycles. From my understanding, this is partially because of the thermal dynamics of an engine cooling and then reheating, and partially because full takeoff power is used. The "usual" time that you log a cycle is when an engine is started and the aircraft then takes off (using full rated takeoff power), but what about unusual situations like: Engine shutdown and restarted in flight Engine started, aircraft takes off, and then returns for a low pass or a touch and go

  • Say I have requested a special VFR to enter Class D airspace. Approach acknowledges and clears me into the Class D airspace. After entering the Class D airspace the airport visibility drops < 1 mile. Am I required to exit the airspace or can I continue as normal?

  • Korean Air Flight 801 crashed during bad visibility conditions in Guam because the ILS was out of commission and the pilot thought it wasn't. My question though is why he even tried to land there in the first place. Wouldn't an airport be closed during bad visibility conditions in that scenario? Or is it possible to land without ILS in bad weather conditions? I seem to remember someone talking about a step-chart or something like that as an alternative to ILS, is that what would be used in a case like that?

  • If conditions at a towered airport are not IFR, can pilots request a special VFR clearance? For example, at a Class D airport, ceiling 1300 broken, 10 sm visibility is technically too low to remain in the pattern (assuming a 1000 foot AGL pattern and maintaining at least 500 feet below clouds), yet it is not IFR. With a Special VFR clearance, the pilot would be able to maintain a 1000 foot pattern and remain clear of clouds. If the pilot requests SVFR, will the tower grant it?

Data information