Efficient antennas for aviation black boxes

David Voight
  • Efficient antennas for aviation black boxes David Voight

    At a frequency of 37.5 kHz a quarter wavelength is about 2 km long. How does the black box efficiently radiate anything if it is not attached to 2 km of antenna?

  • The short version of the answer is 37.5KHz is not "radio frequency", it's "audio frequency", so an antenna is not necessary - just a (very loud) speaker, which is basically what the pinger is.

    Specifically, the 37.5KHz "pinger" tones used in the Underwater Locator Beacons that are bolted onto Cockpit Voice Recorder / Flight Data Recorder "black boxes" are in the low end of what we call ultrasonic frequencies. Water is generally a good conductor of sound (with at least one notable exception), so it is usually possible for sonar detection equipment to "hear" the pinger tones at reasonable distances (with the interpretation of "reasonable" varying based on the depth of the area being searched - much like in air the sound intensity falls off as distance from the source increases, so if we're listening at the surface of the ocean a pinger in 500 feet of water will have a larger coverage footprint than the same pinger in 5000 feet of water).

Related questions and answers
  • At a frequency of 37.5 kHz a quarter wavelength is about 2 km long. How does the black box efficiently radiate anything if it is not attached to 2 km of antenna?

  • Black boxes put out a sonar ping at about 32kHz. From what I've read, depending on sea conditions the ping will be audible at the surface out to about 16 km, leaving a search area of around 1024 square km. By adding a little complexity to the ping circuit, you could encode within it the last received GPS position of the box, before it hits the water. With average sea depth and average sink angles of less than 45° that information would cut the search area down to about 10 square km. Is there some reason this tech is not used, or is it still in the rigorous testing pipeline these devices must

  • Do the manufacturers who build airplanes use their own "black boxes" in the planes, or are there companies whose sole purpose is to develop black boxes? For example, in 2010 in the Airblue Flight 202 incident, the black box had to be sent to Germany for data recovery: He stated that the box would be examined by "foreign experts" in Germany or France as Pakistan does not possess... to the Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses pour la Sécurité de l'Aviation Civile (BEA) in France. It is not clear who developed that black box. Was it the same company that manufactured the airplane? Also, can

  • Why is it that black boxes don't float? From what I gather the answer is: So they will not float away from a water crash site. The ping can be heard underwater with sonar. Finding the ping, finds the site. But why not have two black boxes one that floats and one that stays with the aircraft? That way if a plane is lost at sea, if we find the black box floating, we could use the data to find the other black box and the crash site. Plus the benefits of having a redundancy are enormous.

  • I was flying on Porter Airlines and they had an info card about how similar the Bombardier (I still say DeHavallind) Dash 8 Q400s are to the Bombardier CSeries they have ordered are. There was a cool overlay photo to show relative sizes and shapes: Looking at that image, it got me wondering about the straight vs angled wing. Straight vs angled tails, etc. I get that a jet is faster than a turbo prop. Cseries cruise speeds are: Mach 0.78 (828 km/h, 447 kn, 514 mph) Dash8 Q400 cruise speeds are: 414 mph (667 km/h) 360 knots Those are pretty close and yet that is a pretty radical

  • What is the black pod starboard of the front landing gear on this F-16-I? At first I thought that it was a laser finder, but upon closer inspection it seems to resemble some type of short cannon. What might it be?

  • I never knew much about airplanes before the tragic incident of Malaysia 370. I have been spending a lot of time on Twitter reading various articles and investigations; in one of the articles I read, they stated that unlike transponders, "black boxes" cannot be turned off. However, each ELT is specifically designed for each aircraft, so it cannot be tampered with. You also cannot turn off the black box, as it runs throughout the flight, recording every 30 to 60 seconds. Is it really impossible to turn off the black boxes from within the plane?

  • I'm very interested to learn if there are (m)any (major) (commercial) airports that have runways further away from the terminal(s) than Schiphol's Polderbaan. Which airport is "in the lead" in this respect? The northern end of the Polderbaan, the last runway to be constructed, is 7 km (4.3 mi) north of the control tower, causing taxi times of up to 20 minutes to the terminal. [...] Newest runway, opened 2003. Located to reduce the noise impact on the surrounding population; aircraft have a lengthy 15-minute taxi to and from the Terminal. Wikipedia

  • Why do they call flight data recorders a "black box" if it's orange in color? Just curious about this since I've seen several images of black boxes but they all come in orange colors, and not black. I can understand orange being used to help brightly identify the box , but then why call it a "black" box?

  • Does anyone currently own, or have experience flying, an ICON A5? http://www.iconaircraft.com/ They claim a range of 300 NM (555.6 km); I would like to know whether this is a theoretical calculated range, or a true/actual number.

Data information