I am interested in real-life experiences to do with using LiFePO4 batteries in light aircraft and motorized gliders compared to standard PbA ones. LiFePO4 seem to be a very attractive alternative to the good ole lead ballast with regard to weight/size and useable capacity.
Points of interest include amongst others:
Well, I'll start by saying that (at least to my knowledge, in the USA) there are no certificated/PMA'd/TSO'd LiFePO4 batteries currently available on the market for use in certificated airframes.
That means if you're using a type-certificated aircraft (or an LSA that didn't ship with one originally and for which there is no manufacturer-approved procedure to install one) you're basically out of luck unless you can convince your local FSDO to approve it as a one-off modification to your airframe.
That said, there are some people using them in homebuilts. This guy, for example has used one on his SQ2000 to replace the starter/cranking battery, and there's a company called AeroLithium that sells aviation lithium batteries (albeit uncertified) which some folks seem to be using in (experimental) Carbon Cubs with a good deal of success.
As to the batteries themselves, my aircraft is certificated, I've got no desire to take it experimental, and my relationship with the local FSDO is not one where I could just walk in and say "I want to stick one of these in my plane. Sign off on the 337 form KTHXBYE!" so this is all just theoretical:
Operationally, LiFePO4 is a relatively safe chemistry.
Unlike conventional lead-acid batteries it's not going to spit sulfuric acid on your plane during charging or hard maneuvering. Unlike other Lithium-based chemistries (say Lithium-Cobalt of Dreamliner fire fame) it's not as prone to blowing up or catching fire if short-circuited or otherwise abused (though puncturing it is still a Bad Thing).
Note however that as LiFePO4 is a lithium based chemistry water may not be the best extinguishing agent for a ruptured/burning battery. One of the potential decomposition products of a burning or ruptured LiFePO4 battery in the presence of water is Hydrogen Fluoride (HF), which is rather nasty stuff.
Handling and Charging is generally normal - as in you can connect it to your aircraft charging system with appropriately-rated breakers/fuses.
Checking cell balance is recommended periodically, but without adequate information on the use of these batteries in aircraft we can't say what "periodically" means -- Every 10 hours? Every 50? Annually? (If installing one of these in a homebuilt I'd start with every 10 hours and work from there).
Robustness should be superior to lead-acid batteries in all respects (mechanical and electrical).
For use in an aircraft a sturdy housing around the cells would be a Must Have to prevent the battery from being ruptured in the event of an incident, but that could be produced reasonably.
Electrically LiFePO4 has a lower self-discharge rate, better tolerance for overcharging, and better (flatter) discharge curves - all Good Things. It is also stable over a wide range of temperatures, and at least theoretically will outlast lead-acid batteries on a charge/discharge cycle and calendar-year basis (though again, without real-world utilization data we can't really say anything for sure here).
Cost-Benefit is hard to qualify.
LiFePO4 batteries can be had cheaper than "aircraft batteries", largely owing to the fact that they're not approved for use in certificated aircraft.
Because of their higher energy density they're also substantially lighter for the same amp-hour capacity, which is always attractive when we're talking about aircraft applications.
All of those benefits aren't worth a warm bucket of spit to me because I can't install one in my airplane (though I'd certainly consider it seriously if it were a viable option). If you can install one in your airplane as a replacement for your main battery it may well be worth considering.
I am interested in real-life experiences to do with using LiFePO4 batteries in light aircraft and motorized gliders compared to standard PbA ones. LiFePO4 seem to be a very attractive alternative to the good ole lead ballast with regard to weight/size and useable capacity. Points of interest include amongst others: Operation safety Handling (e.g. with regard to charging) Robustness (electric, mechanical) Compatibility (electric, fittings etc.) Cost vs. Benefit assessment Temperature influence Life expectancy Technical / legal admission (e.g. insurance-related) ...
There are two main types of supplementary oxygen devices in light aircraft: Cannula: Oxygen mask: What are the major differences between these two devices? Is one more suitable for specific siutations than another, or is it just a matter of personal preference?
This is what I know: $V_1$ is the takeoff airspeed after which the aircraft must take off, no matter what happens after $V_1$ has been reached. That's the easy part (I think). $V_R$ is the rotation airspeed Are there any other $V$-speeds? What I'm specifically curious about: Is $V_1$ related to runway length? Is there an absolute maximum $V_1$ for each aircraft type? If so, can it vary...? (this is the case for most light aircraft, but I guess the whole concept is not applicable in that case) What exactly is $V_2$? Is there a $V_3$? (and so on) Anything else worth knowing about $V$-speeds?
In a full motion Level C or D simulator like those used by the airlines and for jet type ratings: How should a pilot log the simulator time in their logbook? I.e. Can you log: Total Time Instru...
Inspired by this question. My knowledge concerning helicopters is quite limited: what is auto-rotation? are there other "rotations" possible? in what do they differ?
Following acceleration paramters are transmitted from Inertial Reference System (IRS) to Flight Control System (FCS) Flight Path Acceleration Along Track Acceleration Cross Track Acceleration Vertical Acceleration Unbiased Normal Acceleration Along Heading Acceleration Cross Heading Acceleration I only know acceleration based on the aircraft axis i.e lateral, longitudinal & Normal acceleration but what these acceleration paramters signifies?
Provided an aircraft with a fly-by-wire system, there are basically two possible choices when it comes deciding how to let the pilots interface with it: rate control / attitude hold: a deflection of the stick will command a certain rate, releasing it will make the system maintain the current attitude. See the Airbus Normal control law. direct control: a deflection of the yoke will directly translate to a deflection of the surfaces, mimicking the "old" mechanical control setup. It is my understanding that this is the design choice of Boeing in its new aircrafts. I do not wish to discuss
Aircraft categories include: Airplane Rotorcraft Glider Lighter than air Powered lift Powered parachute Weight-shift-control I'm familiar with all of these except for weight-shift-control. What are they??
An aircraft's Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System uses line of sight HF via ground stations or satellites to communicate with its base station. This system allows for three... are used to communicate between the aircraft and its base. Various types of messages are possible, for example, relating to fuel consumption, engine performance data, aircraft position, in addition to free... pinged to track an aircraft's position and heading? Would this require any intervention by the pilots? (posted separately) Is this system standard on commercial airliners? What data do Airlines collect
I was looking through my virtual radar logs one of the days and found this "glitchy" ADS-B behavior. I am almost 100% sure that this is not due to my antenna or setup since two independent different... is the "skew" at seemingly same angle? Is that anything? In light of MH370, does this happen often, how reliable is that GPS data? Tail # N657UA Boeing 767-300 Typical route between EGLL and KORD Time of occurrence is approximately: 3/16/2014 6:09pm CST I have also verified FlightAware is ALSO showing the same weird glitch. See below "yellow" highlighted airplane: Same A/C from FlightRadar24