# What dictates the aspect ratio of an aircraft's wing?

Qantas 94 Heavy
• What dictates the aspect ratio of an aircraft's wing? Qantas 94 Heavy

When designing an aircraft, there has to be a decision as to the aspect ratio of a wing. It's been said that having a higher aspect wing will reduce drag for the same wing area, however most of the time wings are shorter than they can be. So my question is, what exactly dictates the aspect ratio of a wing, and why don't they make them as long as possible?

• Aspect ratio is the ratio based on the span and chord of an aircraft's wings. The span is the length of the wings measured wingtip to wingtip; the chord is the 'depth' of the wing from the leading edge to the trailing edge, measured in a straight line.

Because very few aircraft have constant chord planforms, this requires a not-very-fancy formula to calculate (source: NASA), so that we can effectively average the chord:

$$AR=\frac{b^2}{S}$$

Where:

$AR=$ Aspect ratio

$B=$ Wingspan

$S=$ Wing's area

Math aside, aspect ratio is chosen based on an aircraft's role or requirements. A need for agility dictates a low aspect ratio, as does a need for compactness. In both cases, fighter aircraft and bush aircraft benefit from agility and small size. High aspect ratios provide great cruise efficiency but can have poor landing characteristics (high drag at low speeds or high angles of attack due to frontal area) that are often offset by high-lift devices like flaps and slats.

To the second half of your question: even when a high aspect ratio is desired, wings are not made as long as possible for two reasons.

The first is structural; the bending forces associated with wings of extreme length are, well, extreme, and the materials required are pretty space-age. See high-performance gliders, or at the crazy end, solar- or human-powered aircraft, for examples of this. It's just hard to do at the size of an airliner.

The second reason is more practical: space is expensive. An extremely high-aspect ratio wing takes up a ton of space relative to the rest of the aircraft. In an attempt to offset this, early 777s (which had a larger span than 767s and 747s) were offered with folding wingtips, but nobody bought that option and it got dropped.

• To answer your question it's maybe helpful to remember why a higher aspect ratio generates less drag. A higher aspect ratio causes less induced drag at the same lift than an aerofoil with a lower aspect ratio. Okay, we need a certain amount of lift and our aim is to gain this lift as efficient as possible. Lets do it: Higher aspect ratio -> less drag, less drag less fuel burn, less fuel burn -> higher efficiency - perfect, but there are maybe other ways to reduce drag and safe for example space, or weight - a longer leading edge creates more form drag and where do you park this giant aircraft and it means a lot of weight to get sufficient strength for this giant wing - weight needs lift to fly and more lift causes more drag.

Okay, I think it's clear now, that it's not sufficient to consider only one way of tuning the efficiency of your aircraft. There are also nice possibilities like winglets to reduce induced drag for only a little extra weight and also just a little extra interference drag or a good range of possible CGs which requires left negative lift on the tail = less lift required at the wing. New materials and design techniques also allow to work on the all in all shape of the wing which increases the efficiency rapidly. Building a good aircraft is finding a good balance and so you can't just concentrate on only one possible solution.

I hope my wired talk can help you a little bit, sorry I fly this stuff and I guess all my colleagues are happy that I don't build it ;)

Tags
• When designing an aircraft, there has to be a decision as to the aspect ratio of a wing. It's been said that having a higher aspect wing will reduce drag for the same wing area, however most of the time wings are shorter than they can be. So my question is, what exactly dictates the aspect ratio of a wing, and why don't they make them as long as possible?

• Does anyone have data on how much time the An-225 (only one was produced; it is currently the largest aircraft in the world) spends flying/on missions and how much it waits for customers? This is a very unique aircraft within the scope of contemporary aviation: Also, there is a copy of the plane - partially built. Does that suggest there might be need for the completion of second aircraft, to meet demand?

• Figure 10-5 of the FAA's Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge shows: I didn't think $L/D_{MAX}$ coincided with $D_{MIN}$. Is this Figure accurate?

• We know from other questions and answers that airplanes and gliders in particular can have their performance described in terms of glide polar and Lift-to-Drag ratio. As it appears from the images in the first linked answer (included below), the two are connected to each other. Despite my research I couldn't find a source on how to derive one curve given the other (the polar given the ratio or the ratio given the polar). Is it possible to do so? I have heard from friends that are glider pilots that the glide polar curve can be described as a parabola, but I haven't found any reference

• I just saw a documentary on the design of the Boeing 787 "Dreamliner" and one of the designers said that the wings were inspired by gliders. Looking at the production version of the plane, it is obvious that the wings are indeed more glider-like than other airliners. How does that affect the glide ratio? I can't find any data on this (is there any data on that at all?)

• What are these things hanging off the trailing edge of the wing? I've seen them in almost all of the aircraft I've flown in, and can't remember if they're exclusively Boeing or Airbus.

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of a high-wing vs. low-wing aircraft design? When might one prefer one to the other? Is the answer the same for large and small aircraft?

• This video shows a Hawker jet with the wing fluttering up and down like it's about to break. What can cause flutter like that? Can it actually cause a wing or stabilizer failure? How can flutter be prevented? What should be done if something like this happens?

• Why does the Beech Staggerwing have its low wing in ahead of the high wing? What are the aerodynamic ideas behind this? Other biplanes of the era had the opposite, low wing behind the high one.

• I thought the shape of the wing gave an airplane upward lift. How can it fly if it's upside down?

Data information