How do I use the FAA's WINGS program as a flight review?

  • How do I use the FAA's WINGS program as a flight review? egid

    I know pilots can substitute WINGS phases for the Flight Review otherwise required every two years. How do I do this? Do I have to attend a class to meet all the equivalency requirements?

  • The FAA Safety Team's WINGS program allows pilots to bypass the traditional FAR 61.56 flight review by completing a "phase" of the WINGS program. The program and requirements are detailed in FAA Advisory Circular 61-91 (currently 61-91J).

    The short version is that a "phase" of WINGS consists of three credits of "flight activities" and three credits of "knowledge activities", which must be earned with a 12 calendar month period.

    Flight credits are earned by flying with an instructor and demonstrating safe & proficient flying skills in specific areas of operation.
    For example, one "Basic WINGS" flight activity (worth 1 credit) is demonstrating basic air work - forward slips, steep turns, rectangular course, S-turns, and turns around a point - to Private Pilot practical test standards.
    When you have successfully completed a flight activity your instructor can log in to the FAA Safety / WINGS site and give you credit for completing the activity.

    Knowledge credits are earned by attending seminars and classes - these can be in-person seminars set up by the FAA Safety Team, or on-line webinars. Many of the AOPA Air Safety Institute online courses qualify for WINGS credit.

    When you complete a phase of wings your flight review clock resets, and your flight review becomes due 24 calendar months from the date you completed that phase.

    Ultimately participating in the WINGS program probably means you will be spending more than the "bare minimum" 1 hour of ground time and 1 hour of flight time that FAR 61.56 requires. While you can often complete flight activities in an hour (or much less if you're proficient) the knowledge topics often take longer: the webinars are typically 30-40 minutes each, and in-person seminars can easily last an hour or more.

    The major benefit to the WINGS program is increased safety through building your knowledge and proficiency - the seminars are actually informative (and the in-person ones can even be fun, depending on who is running them), and the flight activities are pretty easy (though there are certainly challenging ones available if you want to push yourself and really sharpen your skills). Resetting the flight review is an enticement to encourage all of us to participate.

Related questions and answers
  • I recently came across this picture of the Boeing 787 series aircraft's incredible wingflex: I suppose this is a consequence of using very light CFRP wings, but how does the wingflex itself improve the 787's flight performance? Do the benefits/drawbacks also apply to the 747-8 (which IIRC also uses CFRP wings)?

  • I know pilots can substitute WINGS phases for the Flight Review otherwise required every two years. How do I do this? Do I have to attend a class to meet all the equivalency requirements?

  • How do flying wings, like the B-2 Stealth bomber, actually keep themselves from yawing out of control without a vertical stabilizer? For the record, I assume this has to be a simple mechanics... WWII. They didn't have flight control computers back then, and the only control complaints I recall them having is that early versions had a tendency to flip over backwards when approaching stall speeds, well, that and the ground effects were pretty strong. But, no mentions of going into flat spins when going into hard maneuvers (that I recall). So how do they control that Y axis on flying wings

  • If a pilot is unable to act as PIC because they need a flight review, can they instead earn WINGS credits and complete a phase? Everything I have read, including ยง61.56 and AC 61-91J, suggests that the answer is "yes", but apparently nobody else is discussing it because I can't seem to find the answer on the internet.

  • StallSpin's answer on the recent question about VFR traffic patterns has got me thinking about the "Remarks" section of the Airport/Facility Directory. We are all taught in training to review the AFD entry for airports we intend to visit (part of FAR 91.103's "become familiar with all available information" requirement), and to comply with any restrictions noted - typically things like "no touch-and-go landings", "Standard traffic pattern required of all aircraft", "Prior Permission Required for jet aircraft", etc. Aside from it being The Right Thing To Do, and avoiding the possibility

  • There are a couple of American military aircraft (the retired F-14 and the B-1 come to mind immediately), that have variable swept wings. I know that they keep the wings full out (roughly perpendicular to the body) during take off and landing, and they have the wings swept back for high speed flight. But I've never really understood why? I assume that at lower speeds the wings out configuration creates more lift. But, why does sweeping the wings back help at high speed? For bonus points: how does the performance gain make up for the cost in weight and complexity created by having

  • I'm just wondering because the wing isn't fixed, but they aren't rotary-wings either.

  • If an airplane is already equipped for RVSM flight, how do we obtain a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for RVSM in order to actually fly in RVSM airspace?

  • over the phone, does using the phrase "mark the tape" do anything? If it does nothing, what is the proper procedure I should use to review something with a controller or their supervisor (e.g.

  • This recent comment reports that: the IMU on new (plane) would localize the aircraft to within 3 feet after a cross-country flight, without any GPS input other than the starting location. I somewhat doubt about this statement, at least for an IMU based solely on inertial measurement: over the duration of a flight, I fear much more error accumulates. So what's the precision of a modern Inertial Measurement Unit over say the duration of a flight, and from what sources is that obtained? If some source (in particular, GPS) becomes unavailable, how does it degrade that accuracy?

Data information